From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:25:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091220192517.GA2016@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091220190434.4274.67855.stgit@bob.kio>
* Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>:
> It was recently discovered that some BIOS implementations load
> dynamic SSDTs when a processor's _PDC method is evaluated.
D'oh, I knew I'd forget something. Here are some bz references:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14710
/ac
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:25:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091220192517.GA2016@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091220190434.4274.67855.stgit@bob.kio>
* Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>:
> It was recently discovered that some BIOS implementations load
> dynamic SSDTs when a processor's _PDC method is evaluated.
D'oh, I knew I'd forget something. Here are some bz references:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\x14824
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\x14710
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-20 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 19:19 [PATCH 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64 Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 01/11] ACPI: processor: call _PDC early Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-28 18:39 ` [PATCH] Fix section mismatch error for acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() Luck, Tony
2010-01-06 22:52 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 7:01 ` Len Brown
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 02/11] ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 03/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 04/11] ACPI: processor: factor out common _PDC settings Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 05/11] ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 05/11] ACPI: processor: finish unifying Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 06/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 07/11] ACPI: processor: introduce acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 08/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_eval_pdc interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:19 ` [PATCH 08/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_eval_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI: processor: open code acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:25 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-12-20 19:25 ` [PATCH 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64 Alex Chiang
2009-12-21 8:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-21 8:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-21 21:17 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-21 21:17 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-22 8:43 ` Len Brown
2009-12-22 8:43 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091220192517.GA2016@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.