From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:44:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091231004446.GD23808@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091226182833.GC9494@in.ibm.com>
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:58:33PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> + /*
> + * Further processing in do_debug() is needed for a) user-space
> + * breakpoints (to generate signals) and b) when the system has
> + * taken exception due to multiple causes
> + */
> + if (bp->attr.bp_addr < TASK_SIZE)
> + rc = NOTIFY_DONE;
BTW, I'm not sure this is the right way to check if we want to send
a signal or not. Although it's not yet supported, we'll probably
bring the support for userspace breakpoints by perf.
May be we should put a "ptrace" flag in struct hw_perf_event instead.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-31 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20091226175533.149765731@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-12-26 18:27 ` [RFC Patch 1/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Clear reserved bits of DR6 in do_debug() K.Prasad
2009-12-30 23:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 18:49 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-10 3:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-26 18:28 ` [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler K.Prasad
2009-12-31 0:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 0:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 19:02 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-10 3:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-11 19:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-16 19:41 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-20 6:01 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-22 9:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22 9:21 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-25 22:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-27 10:29 ` K.Prasad
2009-12-31 0:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-01-25 22:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-27 10:28 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-27 16:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091231004446.GD23808@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.