All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:21:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100125222139.GF5087@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100122092127.GB7127@in.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:51:27PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> > >> Such a behaviour shouldn't be affected by the above change...your
> > >> confirmation would help!
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Hi Jan,
> > > 	I presume that the above explanation makes the role of this
> > > patch/bugfix clear.
> > > 
> > > Kindly let me know if you have any further queries.
> > > 
> > 
> > Nope. There should be really no conflicts of your optimization with kvm.
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> > -- 
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 	Thanks for the confirmation.
> 
> Hi Frederic,
> 	Can you pull these fixes in? (LKML references:
> 20091226182725.GB9494@in.ibm.com and 20091226182833.GC9494@in.ibm.com).


I got a deeper look at these patches and answered with some comments.

If you address these, I can apply for .34 (because it's about optimizations
and not fixes).

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-25 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091226175533.149765731@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-12-26 18:27 ` [RFC Patch 1/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Clear reserved bits of DR6 in do_debug() K.Prasad
2009-12-30 23:45   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 18:49     ` K.Prasad
2010-01-10  3:22       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-26 18:28 ` [RFC Patch 2/2][Bugfix][x86][hw-breakpoint] Fix return-code to notifier chain in hw_breakpoint_handler K.Prasad
2009-12-31  0:33   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31  0:38   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 19:02     ` K.Prasad
2010-01-10  3:18       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-11 19:15         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-16 19:41           ` K.Prasad
2010-01-20  6:01             ` K.Prasad
2010-01-22  9:14               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-01-22  9:21                 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-25 22:21                   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-01-27 10:29                     ` K.Prasad
2009-12-31  0:44   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-25 22:11   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-27 10:28     ` K.Prasad
2010-01-27 16:11       ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100125222139.GF5087@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.