All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:04:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106130400.7f30ae55@torg> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]

RT-ers,

I have a problem with the way cyclictest sets up measurement threads,
but before I went and changed things I thought I would ask if people
cherished this particular behavior. 

Currently, when cyclictest is run with multiple threads (i.e. -t
option) it distributes both the sample interval and the realtime
priority by adding the 'distance' parameter to the interval and
decrementing the priority by one. This means if you have a distance of
500us (default), a specified RT priority of 95 and start four threads,
they will be started with the following parameters:

$ cyclictest -t4 -p95

Will give you:

thread		priority	sample interval
0		95		500
1		94		1000
2		93		1500
3		92		2000

What I'd like to do is modify this logic so that when '-a' (affinity) is
specified, the priority and sample interval will not be altered. I
don't think there's any point in distributing the priority's and
sample intervals when the measurement threads are pinned to their own
CPU. 

So:

$ cyclictest -t4 -p95 -a

Would have each thread at SCHED_FIFO 95 and a sample interval of 500us.

Note that this behavior also occurs when the histogram (-h) option is
specified).

Thoughts?

Clark

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 19:04 Clark Williams [this message]
2010-01-06 19:39 ` [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior John Kacur
2010-01-06 19:39   ` John Kacur
2010-01-06 21:39   ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:04     ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:24       ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:27         ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:50           ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07  0:30             ` Leyendecker, Robert
2010-01-07  7:09               ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07  7:23           ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07 14:47             ` Clark Williams
2010-01-07 14:54               ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-12 16:59 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-01-12 17:04   ` Clark Williams
2010-01-12 17:13     ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100106130400.7f30ae55@torg \
    --to=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.