All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@osadl.org>
To: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:50:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4513BA.5090001@osadl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100106162759.1d4d5b57@torg>

Clark,

>> [..]
>> May I ask you to also include the -n option which is almost always
>> needed? This would then give:
>> -S      --smp              Standard SMP testing (equals -a -t -n -d0),
>>                            same priority on all threads.
> Yeah, you read my mind. How about -m (mlockall) as well?
Hmm, I think that this one is less obvious. Apparently, there are a
bunch of different opinions on mlockall(). I once heard, for example,
the opinion that mlockall() may - under some conditions - introduce a
performance penalty, but I did not verify that. Many real-time systems
do not have a "swap" line in /etc/fstab; mlockall() is not needed in
such systems. In addition, most today's systems have so much RAM that
swapping became a rather rare event. I hope some other RT-ers who are
more knowledgeable about memory management and swapping can comment on this.

Cyclictest was in use for years, before someone introduced the -m
option. I never used this option.

	Carsten.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 19:04 [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior Clark Williams
2010-01-06 19:39 ` John Kacur
2010-01-06 19:39   ` John Kacur
2010-01-06 21:39   ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:04     ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:24       ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-06 22:27         ` Clark Williams
2010-01-06 22:50           ` Carsten Emde [this message]
2010-01-07  0:30             ` Leyendecker, Robert
2010-01-07  7:09               ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07  7:23           ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-07 14:47             ` Clark Williams
2010-01-07 14:54               ` Carsten Emde
2010-01-12 16:59 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2010-01-12 17:04   ` Clark Williams
2010-01-12 17:13     ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4513BA.5090001@osadl.org \
    --to=carsten.emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.