From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:11:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100106045509.245662398@samba.org>
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:
> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
>
So.. what's happening here? Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 4:55 [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 1/6] powerpc: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 2/6] alpha: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-14 18:24 ` Matt Turner
2010-01-14 18:24 ` Matt Turner
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 3/6] ia64: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 4/6] mips: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-11 10:42 ` Ralf Baechle
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 5/6] sparc: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 4:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-07 4:22 ` David Miller
2010-01-07 4:22 ` David Miller
2010-01-06 4:55 ` [patch 6/6] x86: " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 6:36 ` Rusty Russell
2010-01-06 23:00 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-06 23:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-06 23:51 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-07 0:01 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-07 0:25 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-07 0:39 ` Rusty Russell
2010-01-07 8:04 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-06 23:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-01-11 22:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-01-12 1:07 ` [patch 0/6] " Anton Blanchard
2010-01-12 2:04 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100111141136.0ee352b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.