All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel@caiaq.de (Daniel Mack)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Possible suspend/resume regression in .32-rc?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:46:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113114651.GJ8970@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded00911042106u39fd3655mae50a89bd419411b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:06:13AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Stanislav Brabec <utx@penguin.cz> wrote:
> > Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Stanislav Brabec <utx@penguin.cz> wrote:
> >> > Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Commit b5b82df6, from May 2007, breaks no_console_suspend on the OLPC
> >> >> XO laptop. Basically what happens is that upon returning from resume,
> >> >> serial8250_resume_port() will reconfigure the port for high speed
> >> >> mode and all console output will be garbled, making debug of the
> >> >> resume path painful. This patch modifies uart_resume_port() to
> >> >> reset the port to the state it was in before we suspended.
> >> >
> >> > See my patch waiting for approval in LKML thread
> >> > "serial-core: resume serial hardware with no_console_suspend".
> >> >
> >> > It attempts to fix it, but I was not yet able to test it due to spitz
> >> > resume breakage.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Stanislav,
> >>
> >> At first, your patch can't be applied into my latest codebase. I have
> >> to update the patch. But the console resume is still blocked after
> >> applied your patch. It works only after I merge some old code back. My
> >> modified patch is in below.
> >
> > Yes, code changed there a bit. I sent rebased patch later in the thread.
> > Did you try this one? (Well I did not test it yet - in time of sending
> > resume did not work at all on my Zaurus.)
> >
> > Your patch is a bit different. I'll test both as soon as possible.
> >
> >
> 
> Your latest patch works well in my platform. Thanks a lot.

It seems Stanislav's patch is still unmerged in the current git HEAD.
Any idea why it is held back? I have it applied locally since quite a
while here, and it works well. So if it helps, take my Tested-by: for
it.

Daniel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanislav Brabec <utx@penguin.cz>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Eric <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	dbaryshkov@gmail.com, Cyril Hrubis <metan@ucw.cz>,
	arminlitzel@web.de, gregkh@suse.de,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dsaxena@laptop.org, lenz@cs.wisc.edu, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
	omegamoon@gmail.com, thommycheck@gmail.com, Dirk@opfer-online.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: Possible suspend/resume regression in .32-rc?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:46:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113114651.GJ8970@buzzloop.caiaq.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded00911042106u39fd3655mae50a89bd419411b@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 12:06:13AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Stanislav Brabec <utx@penguin.cz> wrote:
> > Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Stanislav Brabec <utx@penguin.cz> wrote:
> >> > Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Commit b5b82df6, from May 2007, breaks no_console_suspend on the OLPC
> >> >> XO laptop. Basically what happens is that upon returning from resume,
> >> >> serial8250_resume_port() will reconfigure the port for high speed
> >> >> mode and all console output will be garbled, making debug of the
> >> >> resume path painful. This patch modifies uart_resume_port() to
> >> >> reset the port to the state it was in before we suspended.
> >> >
> >> > See my patch waiting for approval in LKML thread
> >> > "serial-core: resume serial hardware with no_console_suspend".
> >> >
> >> > It attempts to fix it, but I was not yet able to test it due to spitz
> >> > resume breakage.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Stanislav,
> >>
> >> At first, your patch can't be applied into my latest codebase. I have
> >> to update the patch. But the console resume is still blocked after
> >> applied your patch. It works only after I merge some old code back. My
> >> modified patch is in below.
> >
> > Yes, code changed there a bit. I sent rebased patch later in the thread.
> > Did you try this one? (Well I did not test it yet - in time of sending
> > resume did not work at all on my Zaurus.)
> >
> > Your patch is a bit different. I'll test both as soon as possible.
> >
> >
> 
> Your latest patch works well in my platform. Thanks a lot.

It seems Stanislav's patch is still unmerged in the current git HEAD.
Any idea why it is held back? I have it applied locally since quite a
while here, and it works well. So if it helps, take my Tested-by: for
it.

Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-13 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-31  1:34 Possible suspend/resume regression in .32-rc? Daniel Mack
2009-10-31 12:56 ` Eric Miao
2009-10-31 16:39 ` Robert Jarzmik
2009-11-01  0:48   ` Ben Dooks
2009-11-01 19:54 ` Ryan Mallon
2009-11-01 20:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-11-01 20:54 ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-01 21:33   ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-01 21:33     ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-01 22:03     ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-01 22:03       ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02  9:22       ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02  9:22         ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02  9:29         ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-02  9:29           ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-02  9:38         ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02  9:38           ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02  9:54           ` Eric Miao
2009-11-02  9:54             ` Eric Miao
2009-11-02 10:48           ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02 10:48             ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02 10:51             ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02 10:51               ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02 11:18               ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02 11:18                 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-02 11:27                 ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-02 11:27                   ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-02 12:22                 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02 12:22                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-02  9:57         ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-11-02  9:57           ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-11-03  3:31           ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-03  3:31             ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-03  9:50             ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-11-03  9:50               ` Stanislav Brabec
2009-11-05  5:06               ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-11-05  5:06                 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-13 11:46                 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2010-01-13 11:46                   ` Daniel Mack
2010-01-13 13:42                   ` Stanislav Brabec
2010-01-13 13:42                     ` Stanislav Brabec
2010-01-13 15:33                     ` Greg KH
2010-01-13 15:33                       ` Greg KH
2009-11-01 21:13 ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-01 21:16   ` Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100113114651.GJ8970@buzzloop.caiaq.de \
    --to=daniel@caiaq.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.