All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] rcu: v3 add lockdep-based diagnostics to rcu_dereference()
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:01:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100115010157.GA28221@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello!

This patch series adds lockdep-based checking to the rcu_dereference()
primitive in order to flag misuses of RCU.  The first three patches put
the RCU infrastructure in place, the next five use this infrastructure in
the net, sched, vfs, radix-tree, and idr subsystems, and the last patch
documents how to use the new lockdep-checked rcu_dereference() primitives.

The new (and default-disabled) CONFIG_PROVE_RCU makes this safe to include
in tip/core/rcu -- unlike v2, your system won't complain about RCU misuse
unless you ask it to.  There are still several situations that trigger
on systems I have access to (and I have email out on a couple of them),
some of the remaining will be triggered only by hardware I don't have
access to and kernel features I am unfamiliar with.  So this is ready
for some more-general testing.

Changes since v2 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/4/496):

o	Removed references to the check condition for the non-lockdep
	version of rcu_dereference_check(), thus preventing numerous
	build errors.

o	Create a CONFIG_PROVE_RCU (default disabled) so that developers
	who want to use lockdep only to debug locks aren't bothered 
	by RCU-specific lockdep complaints that will no doubt persist
	for a little bit while some of the more obscure uses of RCU
	are reverse-engineered.

o	Fix a few more issues identified by the checking.

o	Add documentation in Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt.

Changes since v1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/15/553):

o	Made SRCU have per-srcu_struct lockdep maps to prevent lockdep
	from conflating independent uses of SRCU, and updated the
	rcu_dereference() checking in rcutorture to match.

o	Fix a few issues identified by the checking.

o	Disable checking within RCU list macros, RCU radix trees, and
	IDR.

             reply	other threads:[~2010-01-15  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-15  1:01 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: introduce lockdep-based checking to RCU read-side primitives Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] rcu: add lockdep-enabled variants of rcu_dereference() Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcu: disable lockdep checking in RCU list-traversal primitives Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] net: add checking to rcu_dereference() primitives Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] sched: use lockdep-based checking on rcu_dereference() Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] vfs: apply lockdep-based checking to rcu_dereference() uses Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] radix-tree: disable RCU lockdep checking in radix tree Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] idr: apply lockdep-based diagnostics to rcu_dereference() uses Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-18 23:36   ` Josh Triplett
2010-01-19  0:56     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-01-15  1:02 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] rcu: documentation update for CONFIG_PROVE_RCU Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100115010157.GA28221@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.