From: tytso@mit.edu
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in buffer write
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:17:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100116021712.GA25273@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263583812-21355-3-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:30:11PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> index 05eca81..dd58020 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> @@ -304,4 +304,28 @@ static inline int ext4_should_writeback_data(struct inode *inode)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * This function controls whether or not we should try to go down the
> + * dioread_nolock code paths, which makes it safe to avoid taking
> + * i_mutex for direct I/O reads. This only works for extent-based
> + * files, and it doesn't work for nobh or if data journaling is
> + * enabled, since the dioread_nolock code uses b_private to pass
> + * information back to the I/O completion handler, and this conflicts
> + * with the jbd's use of b_private.
> + */
> +static inline int ext4_should_dioread_nolock(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + if (!test_opt(inode->i_sb, DIOREAD_NOLOCK))
> + return 0;
> + if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, NOBH))
> + return 0;
> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> + return 0;
> + if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL)
Oops, this was an embarassing typo. This should have been:
+ if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL))
Thanks to Jiaying for pointing this out.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-16 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 19:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] dioread_nolock patch Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ext4: mechanical change on dio get_block code in prepare for it to be used by buffer write Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-17 14:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-17 16:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-17 16:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-18 3:57 ` tytso
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in " Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-16 2:17 ` tytso [this message]
2010-01-17 14:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-18 5:25 ` Jiaying Zhang
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ext4: Use direct_IO_no_locking in ext4 dio read Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-17 14:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-15 19:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] dioread_nolock patch Ric Wheeler
2010-01-15 19:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-15 20:15 ` tytso
2010-01-15 20:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-15 21:47 ` Michael Rubin
2010-01-22 20:47 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-02-20 0:56 ` Michael Rubin
2010-02-23 0:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-02-16 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-17 19:34 ` Jiaying Zhang
2010-02-19 21:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100116021712.GA25273@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.