From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] ext4: mechanical change on dio get_block code in prepare for it to be used by buffer write
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:06:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y6jw23yn.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263583812-21355-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:30:10 -0500, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> Renaming the dio block allocation flags, variables, and functions
> introduced in Mingming's "Direct IO for holes and fallocate"
> patches so that they can be used by ext4 buffer write as well.
> Also changed the related function comments accordingly to cover
> both direct write and buffer wirte cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 18 ++++++------
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 24 +++++++-------
> fs/ext4/fsync.c | 2 +-
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 2ca1b41..b1dcbb7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct mpage_da_data {
> int pages_written;
> int retval;
> };
> -#define DIO_AIO_UNWRITTEN 0x1
> +#define EXT4_IO_UNWRITTEN 0x1
> typedef struct ext4_io_end {
> struct list_head list; /* per-file finished AIO list */
> struct inode *inode; /* file being written to */
> @@ -364,13 +364,13 @@ struct ext4_new_group_data {
> /* caller is from the direct IO path, request to creation of an
> unitialized extents if not allocated, split the uninitialized
> extent if blocks has been preallocated already*/
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO 0x0008
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO 0x0008
> #define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT 0x0010
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO|\
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO|\
> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT)
> - /* Convert extent to initialized after direct IO complete */
> -#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO_CONVERT_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT|\
> - EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DIO_CREATE_EXT)
> + /* Convert extent to initialized after IO complete */
> +#define EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CONVERT_EXT (EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT|\
> + EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT)
>
All these flags are really confusing. I guess we can make it much more
cleaner. For ex: Why is EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CONVERT_EXT enabling
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT. The renaming to PRE_IO made it
better. But i guess these names should be self documenting.
How about
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE. Indicate we should do block
allocation. But that flag alone doesn't say whether we are suppose
to create init or uninit extent.
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT -> Request the creation of uninit extent
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT -> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE|EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UNINIT_EXT;
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE -> Request for delayed allocaion
reservation
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO -> 0x0008 -> Indicate that we should do all
necessary extent split and make the requested range in to single extent.
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_IO -> Convert the specified range which should be a
single extent into init and then try to merge the extent to left/right
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT -> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CONVERT_EXT -> EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE | EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT_IO;
So from the above list it is only the last flag that is different from
what is already there. But i guess we need more documentation around
these flags.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-17 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-15 19:30 [PATCH v4 0/3] dioread_nolock patch Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ext4: mechanical change on dio get_block code in prepare for it to be used by buffer write Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-17 14:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V [this message]
2010-01-17 16:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-17 16:42 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-18 3:57 ` tytso
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ext4: use ext4_get_block_write in " Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-16 2:17 ` tytso
2010-01-17 14:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-18 5:25 ` Jiaying Zhang
2010-01-15 19:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ext4: Use direct_IO_no_locking in ext4 dio read Theodore Ts'o
2010-01-17 14:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-15 19:39 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] dioread_nolock patch Ric Wheeler
2010-01-15 19:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-15 20:15 ` tytso
2010-01-15 20:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-15 21:47 ` Michael Rubin
2010-01-22 20:47 ` Valerie Aurora
2010-02-20 0:56 ` Michael Rubin
2010-02-23 0:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-02-16 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-17 19:34 ` Jiaying Zhang
2010-02-19 21:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y6jw23yn.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.