From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Wu Jiajun-B06378 <B06378@freescale.com>,
lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Fix full TX queue processing
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:47:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100118154750.GA9224@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
From: Jiajun Wu <b06378@freescale.com>
commit 7583605b6d29f1f7f6fc505b883328089f3485ad ("ucc_geth: Fix empty
TX queue processing") fixed empty TX queue mishandling, but didn't
account another corner case: when TX queue becomes full.
Without this patch the driver will stop transmiting when TX queue
becomes full since 'bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]' actually checks for
two things: queue empty or full.
Let's better check for NULL skb, which unambiguously signals an empty
queue.
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Wu <b06378@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [2.6.32]
---
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:52:26PM +0800, Wu Jiajun-B06378 wrote:
> Yes,'if (!skb)' is enough.
> You can reproduce transmitting stopping if you use
> 'if ((bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ])' and run ipforwarding with MTU=64
> 1Gbps 100%linerate.
OK, let's resend the patch with just !skb check?
drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
index 96bdc0b..eb8fe7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
@@ -3279,13 +3279,12 @@ static int ucc_geth_tx(struct net_device *dev, u8 txQ)
/* Handle the transmitted buffer and release */
/* the BD to be used with the current frame */
- if (bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]) /* queue empty? */
+ skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
+ if (!skb)
break;
dev->stats.tx_packets++;
- skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
-
if (skb_queue_len(&ugeth->rx_recycle) < RX_BD_RING_LEN &&
skb_recycle_check(skb,
ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.max_rx_buf_length +
--
1.6.5.7
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Wu Jiajun-B06378 <B06378@freescale.com>,
Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Fix full TX queue processing
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:47:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100118154750.GA9224@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
From: Jiajun Wu <b06378@freescale.com>
commit 7583605b6d29f1f7f6fc505b883328089f3485ad ("ucc_geth: Fix empty
TX queue processing") fixed empty TX queue mishandling, but didn't
account another corner case: when TX queue becomes full.
Without this patch the driver will stop transmiting when TX queue
becomes full since 'bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]' actually checks for
two things: queue empty or full.
Let's better check for NULL skb, which unambiguously signals an empty
queue.
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Wu <b06378@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [2.6.32]
---
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:52:26PM +0800, Wu Jiajun-B06378 wrote:
> Yes,'if (!skb)' is enough.
> You can reproduce transmitting stopping if you use
> 'if ((bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ])' and run ipforwarding with MTU=64
> 1Gbps 100%linerate.
OK, let's resend the patch with just !skb check?
drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
index 96bdc0b..eb8fe7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
@@ -3279,13 +3279,12 @@ static int ucc_geth_tx(struct net_device *dev, u8 txQ)
/* Handle the transmitted buffer and release */
/* the BD to be used with the current frame */
- if (bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]) /* queue empty? */
+ skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
+ if (!skb)
break;
dev->stats.tx_packets++;
- skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
-
if (skb_queue_len(&ugeth->rx_recycle) < RX_BD_RING_LEN &&
skb_recycle_check(skb,
ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.max_rx_buf_length +
--
1.6.5.7
next reply other threads:[~2010-01-18 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-18 15:47 Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-01-18 15:47 ` [PATCH] ucc_geth: Fix full TX queue processing Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-19 10:00 ` David Miller
2010-01-19 10:00 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100118154750.GA9224@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=B06378@freescale.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.