From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
cl@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Fix unmap_vma() bug related to mmu_notifiers
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:18:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128031841.GG6616@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100126213853.GY30452@random.random>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:38:53PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:29:04PM -0600, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:16:15PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > The old patches are in my ftp area, they should still apply, you
> > > should concentrate testing with those additional ones applied, then it
> > > will work for xpmem too ;)
> >
> > Andrea, could you point me at your ftp area?
>
> Sure, this is the very latest version I maintained:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18/
Let me start with what XPMEM currently has.
We adjusted xpmem so that the mmu_notifier_invalidate_page() callout
does not need to sleep. It takes the arguments passed in and adds them
to a queue for clearing the pages. We added a seperate kernel thread
which manages this clearing.
The mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() likewise does not really need
to sleep either.
That leaves the mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() callout. This does
not need to drop the mm_sem. It does need to be able to sleep waiting
for the invalidations to complete on the other process. That other
process may be on a different SSI connected to the same Numalink fabric.
I think that with the SRCU patch, we have enough. Is that true or have
I missed something?
Thanks,
Robin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
cl@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Fix unmap_vma() bug related to mmu_notifiers
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:18:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100128031841.GG6616@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100126213853.GY30452@random.random>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:38:53PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 03:29:04PM -0600, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:16:15PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > The old patches are in my ftp area, they should still apply, you
> > > should concentrate testing with those additional ones applied, then it
> > > will work for xpmem too ;)
> >
> > Andrea, could you point me at your ftp area?
>
> Sure, this is the very latest version I maintained:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.6/2.6.26-rc7/mmu-notifier-v18/
Let me start with what XPMEM currently has.
We adjusted xpmem so that the mmu_notifier_invalidate_page() callout
does not need to sleep. It takes the arguments passed in and adds them
to a queue for clearing the pages. We added a seperate kernel thread
which manages this clearing.
The mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() likewise does not really need
to sleep either.
That leaves the mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() callout. This does
not need to drop the mm_sem. It does need to be able to sleep waiting
for the invalidations to complete on the other process. That other
process may be on a different SSI connected to the same Numalink fabric.
I think that with the SRCU patch, we have enough. Is that true or have
I missed something?
Thanks,
Robin
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-28 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 17:45 [PATCH] - Fix unmap_vma() bug related to mmu_notifiers Jack Steiner
2010-01-25 17:45 ` Jack Steiner
2010-01-25 19:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-25 19:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-25 21:10 ` Jack Steiner
2010-01-25 21:10 ` Jack Steiner
2010-01-25 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-25 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-26 21:29 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-26 21:29 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-26 21:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-26 21:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-28 3:18 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2010-01-28 3:18 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-28 3:49 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-28 3:49 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-28 10:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-28 10:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-28 13:25 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-28 13:25 ` Robin Holt
2010-01-28 15:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-01-28 15:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100128031841.GG6616@sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.