All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com>
To: "Daniel T. Cobra" <dcobra@videam.com.br>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Long delay to (re)connect a bluetooth mouse
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:58:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100203145833.2c370c51@strolchi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B6961A4.5040503@videam.com.br>

On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:44:36 -0200
"Daniel T. Cobra" <dcobra@videam.com.br> wrote:

> For me, this is going to be a shot in the dark, not being familiar with 
> the Bluetooth protocol, but could one of you developers please say if 
> any of what follows makes sense?

[Disclaimer: I'm neither a bluez develper, nor am I familiar with the
 protocols etc ;)]

Yee, I think this makes sense. Maybe we can make bluez just cache the
data instead of re-requesting it at wakeup (I'm not sure if it should
do that actually, because the spec says so, or if the mouse just has a
broken implementation and we just should do it for convenience). After
all I don't expect the extended features to change all the time while
the mouse is asleep ;)
> 
> Comparing the hci dumps from my mouse's reconnection and Stefan's, I am 
> suspicious of the first line below:
> 
> [...]                        
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.136170 < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 10
>     L2CAP(s): Info req: type 2
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.144090 > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
>     Read Remote Supported Features (0x01|0x001b) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.144103 < HCI Command: Remote Name Request 
> (0x01|0x0019) plen 10
>     bdaddr 00:16:38:E2:A5:57 mode 2 clkoffset 0x0000
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.146089 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets 
> (0x13) plen 5           
>     handle 42 packets 2
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.149092 > HCI Event: Read Remote Supported Features 
> (0x0b) plen 11       
>     status 0x00 handle 42
>     Features: 0xbc 0x02 0x04 0x28 0x08 0x08 0x00 0x00
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.155089 > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
>     Remote Name Request (0x01|0x0019) status 0x00 ncmd 1
> 2010-01-08 00:15:03.227093 > HCI Event: Remote Name Req Complete (0x07) 
> plen 255
>     status 0x00 bdaddr 00:16:38:E2:A5:57 name 'Targus Bluetooth Media 
> Mouse for Notebook'
> 2010-01-08 00:15:07.135253 < ACL data: handle 42 flags 0x02 dlen 16
>     L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0042 result 0 status 0
>       Connection successful
> [...]
> 
> In Stefan's hci dump we have:
> 
> [...]
> 2010-01-05 11:36:51.517876 < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 10
>     L2CAP(s): Info req: type 2
> 2010-01-05 11:36:51.525808 > ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 16
>     L2CAP(s): Info rsp: type 2 result 0
>       Extended feature mask 0x0004
>         Bi-directional QoS
> 2010-01-05 11:36:51.525853 < ACL data: handle 11 flags 0x02 dlen 16
>     L2CAP(s): Connect rsp: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0042 result 0 status 0
>       Connection successful
> [...]
> 
> What is happening here? Is bluez making a request to read the device's 
> extended features and Stefan's mouse replies while mine doesn't (and the 
> 4 sec delay I experience is bluez waiting for the reply until it times out)?
> 
> If it helps, here's the output of "hcitool info" for my mouse:
> 
> Requesting information ...
>         BD Address:  00:16:38:A2:C5:56
>         Device Name: Targus Bluetooth Media Mouse for Notebook
>         LMP Version: 1.1 (0x1) LMP Subversion: 0x100
>         Manufacturer: Broadcom Corporation (15)
>         Features: 0xbc 0x02 0x04 0x28 0x08 0x08 0x00 0x00
>                 <encryption> <slot offset> <timing accuracy> <role switch>
>                 <sniff mode> <RSSI> <power control> <enhanced iscan>
>                 <interlaced pscan> <AFH cap. slave> <AFH cap. master>
> 
> So, am I going in the right direction or am I totally off the mark? I'd 
> really appreciate some comment from you guys who know how this works.

I don't know how it works, but your conclusion seems logical to me.
Which, of course, says nothing about its correctness ;)

Have fun,

	seife
-- 
Stefan Seyfried

"Any ideas, John?"
"Well, surrounding them's out."

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-03 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-15 19:43 Long delay to (re)connect a bluetooth mouse dcobra
2009-12-17 15:17 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-18 17:43   ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-18 22:04     ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-18 22:49       ` dcobra
2009-12-18 22:58         ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19  1:21           ` dcobra
2009-12-22 12:02             ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-22 12:09               ` Daniel T. Cobra
     [not found]                 ` <53ea87da0912222033y530c83dci41bb6d9b99ece6c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23 11:01                   ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-23 15:19                   ` Daniel T. Cobra
     [not found]                   ` <4B32336C.8080806@videam.com.br>
     [not found]                     ` <53ea87da0912230727q617dce1axe5053cd32d03bbf5@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23 15:38                       ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-23 15:48           ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-23 16:00             ` venu
2009-12-23 17:53             ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-29 15:01               ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-01-04 18:48                 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-01-05 10:51                   ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-02-03 11:44                     ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-03 13:58                       ` Stefan Seyfried [this message]
2010-02-03 14:12                       ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-02-03 14:34                         ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-03 14:37                           ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-02-03 17:13                             ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-03 18:04                               ` Iain Hibbert
2010-02-04 16:19                                 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-04 18:13                                   ` Iain Hibbert
2010-02-05 11:24                                     ` Daniel T. Cobra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100203145833.2c370c51@strolchi \
    --to=stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com \
    --cc=dcobra@videam.com.br \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.