From: "Daniel T. Cobra" <dcobra@videam.com.br>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Long delay to (re)connect a bluetooth mouse
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:34:54 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B69898E.1070001@videam.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1265206358.31341.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Thanks, Marcel:
Great! It is starting to make sense. Next, let me ask two questions:
1) You say the information request is needed, but do you mean it is
needed at every reconnection with the device or, as Stefan suggested,
would it make sense to request it only when the connection is first
established and cache the result?
2) Is there a way to know that the device does not support extended
features, to avoid sending a request that is going to time out without a
reply? In net/bluetooth/hci_event.c I found this:
1171 if (conn->state == BT_CONFIG) {
1172 if (!ev->status && lmp_ssp_capable(hdev) &&
1173 lmp_ssp_capable(conn)) {
1174 struct
hci_cp_read_remote_ext_features cp;
1175 cp.handle = ev->handle;
1176 cp.page = 0x01;
1177 hci_send_cmd(hdev,
1178 HCI_OP_READ_REMOTE_EXT_FEATURES,
1179 sizeof(cp),
&cp);
1180 } else {
1181 conn->state = BT_CONNECTED;
1182 hci_proto_connect_cfm(conn, ev->status);
1183 hci_conn_put(conn);
1184 }
1185 }
Is this the right place to look? It seems SSP capability is used as a
test for whether to read the device's extended features. Is this really
the best way, or could there be a more suitable indicator of whether the
device supports extended features, thus avoiding the timeout?
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-03 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 19:43 Long delay to (re)connect a bluetooth mouse dcobra
2009-12-17 15:17 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-18 17:43 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-18 22:04 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-18 22:49 ` dcobra
2009-12-18 22:58 ` Marcel Holtmann
2009-12-19 1:21 ` dcobra
2009-12-22 12:02 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-22 12:09 ` Daniel T. Cobra
[not found] ` <53ea87da0912222033y530c83dci41bb6d9b99ece6c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23 11:01 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-23 15:19 ` Daniel T. Cobra
[not found] ` <4B32336C.8080806@videam.com.br>
[not found] ` <53ea87da0912230727q617dce1axe5053cd32d03bbf5@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-23 15:38 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-23 15:48 ` Stefan Seyfried
2009-12-23 16:00 ` venu
2009-12-23 17:53 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2009-12-29 15:01 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-01-04 18:48 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-01-05 10:51 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-02-03 11:44 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-03 13:58 ` Stefan Seyfried
2010-02-03 14:12 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-02-03 14:34 ` Daniel T. Cobra [this message]
2010-02-03 14:37 ` Marcel Holtmann
2010-02-03 17:13 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-03 18:04 ` Iain Hibbert
2010-02-04 16:19 ` Daniel T. Cobra
2010-02-04 18:13 ` Iain Hibbert
2010-02-05 11:24 ` Daniel T. Cobra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B69898E.1070001@videam.com.br \
--to=dcobra@videam.com.br \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.