From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] wsync export option
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:44:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100203233755.17677.96582.stgit@case> (raw)
In April I did some research on why synchronous NFSv3 performance on XFS is so
rotten when compared to local filesystem performance. The workload I chose to
work with is tar.
After taking some measurements I came to the conclusion that one of the big
problems is that we're not treating the log as stable storage. By calling
write_inode_now() we've written the changes to the log first and then gone and
also written them out to the inode on disk.
In a short discussion of this issue on the xfs-oss list it was suggested that I
post the patches here for discussion.
The following series is adds a 'wsync' export option to nfsd. It is intended
to be used on XFS with the wsync mount option. When you already have a
synchronous log there is no need to sync metadata separately.
This is barely tested, YMMV, I could have this all wrong, etc, etc. Here are
some very unscientific measurements taken over gigabit ethernet.
# time tar -xvf /mnt2/quilt-0.47.tar > /dev/null
No XFS wsync, no NFS wsync:
0m13.177s 0m13.301s 0m13.528s
XFS wsync set, no NFS wsync:
0m13.019s 0m13.232s 0m13.094s
XFS wsync set, NFS wsync set:
0m8.361s 0m8.400s 0m8.301s
Curious to hear if this is a reasonable thing to do. Suggestions welcome.
Thanks!
Ben
---
Ben Myers (4):
Add 'wsync' export option.
Add datasync argument to nfsd_sync_dir().
If 'wsync' call vfs_fsync() instead of write_inode_now().
If 'wsync' pass datasync=1 to vfs_fsync().
fs/nfsd/export.c | 1 +
fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 2 +
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
fs/nfsd/vfs.h | 2 +
include/linux/nfsd/export.h | 4 ++-
5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-03 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-03 23:44 Ben Myers [this message]
2010-02-03 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] Add 'wsync' export option Ben Myers
2010-02-03 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] Add datasync argument to nfsd_sync_dir() Ben Myers
2010-02-03 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] If 'wsync' call vfs_fsync() instead of write_inode_now() Ben Myers
2010-02-03 23:44 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] If 'wsync' pass datasync=1 to vfs_fsync() Ben Myers
2010-02-04 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 17:20 ` bpm
2010-02-04 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 18:38 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-02-04 18:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 18:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-02-03 23:47 ` [ RFC PATCH 5/4 ] Add wsync export option to nfs-utils bpm
2010-02-03 23:58 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] wsync export option Trond Myklebust
2010-02-04 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 18:15 ` bpm
2010-02-04 18:15 ` bpm
2010-02-04 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-04 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100203233755.17677.96582.stgit@case \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.