From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: hung bootup with "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off switch out of staging."
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:12:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100204181218.GA6175@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100204175928.GA20595@srcf.ucam.org>
* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:54:45PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > But you could claim that it's not a regression because 1) technically the
> > code got introduced in drivers/staging/, and staging drivers are not on
> > the regression list 2) the Kconfig value is default-off so it can only
> > harm those who got lured by a new Kconfig value popping up in -rc7 in a
> > well working driver they already have enabled.
> >
> > So the moving of driver functionality from drivers/staging/ to drivers/
> > is a grey area it appears. Wouldnt it have been better to do this in the
> > next merge window, as all other drivers do? It's not new hardware
> > enablement either, it's feature enablement for an existing driver.
>
> The reason the option was in staging (as has been mentioned before) was
> because the ABI wasn't felt to be stable enough. Upstream is now willing to
> commit to that stability, so now seems as good a time to move it as any.
> There's no code change and there's no default configuration change, so I
> really can't see any way that it can be classed as a regression.
But that argument in essence renders the regression policy meaningless for
such code: just about any new driver feature under the sun could be shaped as
a Kconfig option, introduced via a drivers/staging Kconfig entry, and then
activated via a twoliner commit in a later -rc.
IMHO the point of tracking regressions is to reduce the bugginess of the
kernel and thus to help users, not to give ground for legalistic arguments.
There _are_ common-sense exceptions from the regression rules, such as the
introduction of a new piece of hardware that was previously unsupported
(hence there's no expectation of stability) - but the tweaking of an
existing, widely used driver (even if the new opion is default-off) hardly
seems to qualify for that.
I dont mind making useful exceptions from rules, as long as we are honest
about having done it.
Anyway, i've bisected it back to that Kconfig change and i am able to work
the crashes around by reverting that, so my immediate problems are solved.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-04 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 2:20 [git pull] drm fixes Dave Airlie
2010-02-01 2:53 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:17 ` [crash, PATCH] Revert "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off switch out of staging." Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 8:25 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:25 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:39 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 20:39 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:14 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 21:14 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 0:43 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 0:43 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 15:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 8:35 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:37 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:37 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 20:34 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 6:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 6:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 6:39 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 6:39 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 7:49 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 7:49 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 7:17 ` hung bootup with " Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 16:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 16:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:36 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 17:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 17:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-02-04 18:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-04 19:28 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-04 20:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:00 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 18:30 ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 18:30 ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:18 ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 19:18 ` Alex Deucher
2010-02-04 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-04 19:34 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 19:34 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 20:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:27 ` david
2010-02-04 20:27 ` david
2010-02-04 20:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 20:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 20:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 20:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 21:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 21:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-04 21:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-05 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 8:34 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 9:18 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 9:18 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-05 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-05 8:34 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-04 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 21:35 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-04 21:35 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-06 11:10 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-02-06 11:10 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-02-04 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-04 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 19:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-02-04 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-04 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 20:34 ` [crash, PATCH] Revert " Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:35 ` Dave Airlie
2010-02-02 8:58 ` Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 11:59 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 15:11 ` Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 15:11 ` Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 11:59 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 8:58 ` Domenico Andreoli
2010-02-02 11:56 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 11:56 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 23:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 23:15 ` Jerome Glisse
2010-02-02 15:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-01 2:53 ` [git pull] drm fixes Dave Airlie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100204181218.GA6175@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.