From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:10:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100207041013.891441102@intel.com> (raw)
Andrew,
It seems there are no strong objections against the 512KB readahead size.
(Or, anyone would prefer an 1MB readahead? Chris Mason picked a 4MB size
for btrfs after all.)
So would you include the patchset for wider tests in -mm? I reordered the
patchset a bit: the first 2 patches are good candidates for 2.6.34, while
the others may need longer tests.
Changes since RFC:
- move the lenthy intro text to individual patch changelogs
- treat get_capacity()==0 as uninitilized value (Thanks to Vivek Goyal)
- increase readahead size limit for small devices (Thanks to Jens Axboe)
- add fio test results by Vivek Goyal
[PATCH 01/11] readahead: limit readahead size for small devices
[PATCH 02/11] readahead: retain inactive lru pages to be accessed soon
[PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size
[PATCH 04/11] readahead: introduce {MAX|MIN}_READAHEAD_PAGES macros for ease of use
[PATCH 05/11] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags
[PATCH 06/11] readahead: thrashing safe context readahead
[PATCH 07/11] readahead: record readahead patterns
[PATCH 08/11] readahead: add tracing event
[PATCH 09/11] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
[PATCH 10/11] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek()
[PATCH 11/11] radixtree: speed up next/prev hole search
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:10:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100207041013.891441102@intel.com> (raw)
Andrew,
It seems there are no strong objections against the 512KB readahead size.
(Or, anyone would prefer an 1MB readahead? Chris Mason picked a 4MB size
for btrfs after all.)
So would you include the patchset for wider tests in -mm? I reordered the
patchset a bit: the first 2 patches are good candidates for 2.6.34, while
the others may need longer tests.
Changes since RFC:
- move the lenthy intro text to individual patch changelogs
- treat get_capacity()==0 as uninitilized value (Thanks to Vivek Goyal)
- increase readahead size limit for small devices (Thanks to Jens Axboe)
- add fio test results by Vivek Goyal
[PATCH 01/11] readahead: limit readahead size for small devices
[PATCH 02/11] readahead: retain inactive lru pages to be accessed soon
[PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size
[PATCH 04/11] readahead: introduce {MAX|MIN}_READAHEAD_PAGES macros for ease of use
[PATCH 05/11] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags
[PATCH 06/11] readahead: thrashing safe context readahead
[PATCH 07/11] readahead: record readahead patterns
[PATCH 08/11] readahead: add tracing event
[PATCH 09/11] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
[PATCH 10/11] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek()
[PATCH 11/11] radixtree: speed up next/prev hole search
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:10:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100207041013.891441102@intel.com> (raw)
Andrew,
It seems there are no strong objections against the 512KB readahead size.
(Or, anyone would prefer an 1MB readahead? Chris Mason picked a 4MB size
for btrfs after all.)
So would you include the patchset for wider tests in -mm? I reordered the
patchset a bit: the first 2 patches are good candidates for 2.6.34, while
the others may need longer tests.
Changes since RFC:
- move the lenthy intro text to individual patch changelogs
- treat get_capacity()==0 as uninitilized value (Thanks to Vivek Goyal)
- increase readahead size limit for small devices (Thanks to Jens Axboe)
- add fio test results by Vivek Goyal
[PATCH 01/11] readahead: limit readahead size for small devices
[PATCH 02/11] readahead: retain inactive lru pages to be accessed soon
[PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size
[PATCH 04/11] readahead: introduce {MAX|MIN}_READAHEAD_PAGES macros for ease of use
[PATCH 05/11] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags
[PATCH 06/11] readahead: thrashing safe context readahead
[PATCH 07/11] readahead: record readahead patterns
[PATCH 08/11] readahead: add tracing event
[PATCH 09/11] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats
[PATCH 10/11] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek()
[PATCH 11/11] radixtree: speed up next/prev hole search
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-07 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-07 4:10 Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 00/11] 512K readahead size with thrashing safe readahead Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] readahead: limit readahead size for small devices Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] readahead: retain inactive lru pages to be accessed soon Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 03/11] readahead: bump up the default readahead size Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 7:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-08 7:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-08 7:20 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-08 13:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 13:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 13:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 13:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11 21:37 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-11 21:37 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-11 23:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-02-11 23:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-02-12 0:04 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-12 0:04 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-12 13:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-12 13:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-12 20:20 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-12 20:20 ` Matt Mackall
2010-02-21 2:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 2:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 04/11] readahead: introduce {MAX|MIN}_READAHEAD_PAGES macros for ease of use Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 05/11] readahead: replace ra->mmap_miss with ra->ra_flags Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 8:19 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-08 8:19 ` Nick Piggin
2010-02-08 13:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-08 13:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 06/11] readahead: thrashing safe context readahead Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 07/11] readahead: record readahead patterns Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 08/11] readahead: add tracing event Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] readahead: add /debug/readahead/stats Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] readahead: dont do start-of-file readahead after lseek() Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] radixtree: speed up next/prev hole search Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-07 4:10 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100207041013.891441102@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.