All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: rob@landley.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, atar4qemu@googlemail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28.
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002220128.21067.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100221.155719.226789440.davem@davemloft.net>

On Monday 22 February 2010 12:57:19 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:25:09 -0600
> 
> > 085219f79cad89291699bd2bfb21c9fdabafe65f is first bad commit
> > commit 085219f79cad89291699bd2bfb21c9fdabafe65f
> > Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > Date:   Fri Jan 2 18:47:34 2009 -0800
> > 
> >     sparc32: use proper types in struct stat
> >     
> >     Like sparc64 use proper types in struct stat
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > 
> > This commit breaks stat and makes sparc32 essentially unusable.  It changes 
> > the size of the various types in stat.h, and means that if you "mount -t tmpfs 
> > /tmp /tmp" and then try to ls /tmp, ls dies with a memory allocation error.
> > 
> > I've confirmed that reverting it fixes the problem.
> 
> Thanks for tracking this down Rob, I'll work on a fix and
> push it around.

Looking at how whole sparc32 has been apparently broken for over a year now
because of a purely cleanup patch I wonder if it would be appropriate to
make sparc32 into 'legacy only' and provide 'a stability promise' for it?

Just an idea.. ;)

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	blauwirbel@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
	atar4qemu@googlemail.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28.
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:28:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002220128.21067.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100221.155719.226789440.davem@davemloft.net>

On Monday 22 February 2010 12:57:19 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:25:09 -0600
> 
> > 085219f79cad89291699bd2bfb21c9fdabafe65f is first bad commit
> > commit 085219f79cad89291699bd2bfb21c9fdabafe65f
> > Author: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> > Date:   Fri Jan 2 18:47:34 2009 -0800
> > 
> >     sparc32: use proper types in struct stat
> >     
> >     Like sparc64 use proper types in struct stat
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > 
> > This commit breaks stat and makes sparc32 essentially unusable.  It changes 
> > the size of the various types in stat.h, and means that if you "mount -t tmpfs 
> > /tmp /tmp" and then try to ls /tmp, ls dies with a memory allocation error.
> > 
> > I've confirmed that reverting it fixes the problem.
> 
> Thanks for tracking this down Rob, I'll work on a fix and
> push it around.

Looking at how whole sparc32 has been apparently broken for over a year now
because of a purely cleanup patch I wonder if it would be appropriate to
make sparc32 into 'legacy only' and provide 'a stability promise' for it?

Just an idea.. ;)

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-22  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-11 11:20 [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries Rob Landley
2010-02-11 12:32 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-14  8:36   ` Rob Landley
2010-02-14 14:41     ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-15 11:10       ` Rob Landley
2010-02-15 11:19         ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-15 12:58           ` Rob Landley
2010-02-15 13:01             ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 18:31               ` Rob Landley
2010-02-16 18:36                 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 19:14                   ` Rob Landley
2010-02-15 13:08             ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-02-16  0:52               ` Rob Landley
2010-02-16  9:31                 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 18:14                   ` Rob Landley
2010-02-17  9:24                     ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-17 15:45                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-17 18:55                         ` Rob Landley
2010-02-17 20:46                           ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-18 11:38                             ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:17                               ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 14:10                                 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:05                             ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 11:21                           ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-18 13:14                             ` Rob Landley
2010-02-18 14:19                               ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 17:17                             ` [Qemu-devel] Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) Rob Landley
2010-02-20 17:34                               ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2010-02-20 18:38                                 ` Rob Landley
2010-02-20 21:59                                   ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-20 23:12                                     ` Rob Landley
2010-02-21 16:25                                       ` Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28 Rob Landley
2010-02-21 16:25                                         ` [Qemu-devel] " Rob Landley
2010-02-21 23:57                                         ` David Miller
2010-02-21 23:57                                           ` [Qemu-devel] " David Miller
2010-02-22  0:28                                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2010-02-22  0:28                                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-02-22  2:03                                             ` Rob Landley
2010-02-22  2:03                                               ` [Qemu-devel] " Rob Landley
2010-02-22  2:06                                         ` David Miller
2010-02-22  2:06                                           ` [Qemu-devel] " David Miller
2010-03-27  3:35                                           ` Rob Landley
2010-03-27  3:37                                             ` David Miller
2010-03-27  7:44                                               ` Rob Landley
2010-03-27 23:31                                                 ` David Miller
2010-02-20 21:59                                   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 21:39                                 ` Artyom Tarasenko
2010-02-20 22:03                                   ` Blue Swirl
2010-02-17 16:36                       ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries Rob Landley
2010-02-16  8:21           ` [Qemu-devel] " Stuart Brady
2010-02-28 21:05             ` Aurelien Jarno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201002220128.21067.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=atar4qemu@googlemail.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.