From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: board/device file names, and machine names
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:24:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303142437.GA1740@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed 2010-03-03 10:19:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> >
> > > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > >
> > > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > > answer?
> >
> > When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> > issue"?
>
> It's clear that all you want to have is an argument. This ends here.
It's clear that all I want is reasonable arm maintainer.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, swetland@google.com,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: board/device file names, and machine names
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:24:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303142437.GA1740@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303101957.GA9848@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed 2010-03-03 10:19:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:18:00AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > > Given the amount of discussion there's already been, I'm going to come
> > > > > > > down hard on this issue to kill the discussion.
> >
> > > > So... dwalker is maintainer of arch-msm, and does not like the
> > > > codenames. Then you come, and just because are maintainer of arm,
> > > > override the decision, without even notifying l-k?
> > >
> > > So you don't think that Daniel, who was *explicitly* asking for my
> > > suggestions and opinions, is entitled to a clear and straight
> > > answer?
> >
> > When someone asks for your suggestions, you can "go down hard on this
> > issue"?
>
> It's clear that all you want to have is an argument. This ends here.
It's clear that all I want is reasonable arm maintainer.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-02 21:29 board/device file names, and machine names Daniel Walker
2010-03-02 22:56 ` Brian Swetland
2010-03-02 23:29 ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-02 23:38 ` Brian Swetland
2010-03-03 3:42 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-03 3:36 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-03 8:00 ` Brian Swetland
2010-03-03 19:08 ` Theodore Tso
2010-03-03 19:22 ` Theodore Tso
2010-03-03 19:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-02 23:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 0:39 ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-03 0:47 ` Tim Bird
2010-03-03 0:52 ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-03 1:01 ` Brian Swetland
2010-03-03 3:52 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-03 8:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 9:17 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 10:00 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 10:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 10:18 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 10:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 10:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-03 14:24 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2010-03-03 14:24 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-03 14:38 ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-03 22:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-03 22:27 ` Brian Swetland
2010-03-03 3:25 ` Bill Gatliff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100303142437.GA1740@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.