All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, eranian@google.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:39:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303164306.072186867@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20100303163936.906011640@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: perf-x86-cleanup-args2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7246 bytes --]

Pass the ful perf_event into the x86_pmu functions so that those may
make use of more than the hw_perf_event, and while doing this, remove
the superfluous second argument.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |   31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c    |   10 ++++++----
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	int		(*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *);
 	void		(*disable_all)(void);
 	void		(*enable_all)(void);
-	void		(*enable)(struct hw_perf_event *, int);
-	void		(*disable)(struct hw_perf_event *, int);
+	void		(*enable)(struct perf_event *);
+	void		(*disable)(struct perf_event *);
 	unsigned	eventsel;
 	unsigned	perfctr;
 	u64		(*event_map)(int);
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
 			set_bit(hwc->idx, cpuc->active_mask);
 			cpuc->events[hwc->idx] = event;
 
-			x86_pmu.enable(hwc, hwc->idx);
+			x86_pmu.enable(event);
 			perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 		}
 		cpuc->n_added = 0;
@@ -853,15 +853,16 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
 	x86_pmu.enable_all();
 }
 
-static inline void __x86_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static inline void __x86_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
 {
-	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + idx,
+	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx,
 			      hwc->config | ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
 }
 
-static inline void x86_pmu_disable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static inline void x86_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + idx, hwc->config);
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, hwc->config);
 }
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64 [X86_PMC_IDX_MAX], pmc_prev_left);
@@ -922,11 +923,11 @@ x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_ev
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void x86_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static void x86_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 	if (cpuc->enabled)
-		__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc, idx);
+		__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -969,13 +970,11 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_ev
 
 static int x86_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
-
-	if (hwc->idx == -1)
+	if (event->hw.idx == -1)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
-	x86_pmu.enable(hwc, hwc->idx);
+	x86_pmu.enable(event);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -989,7 +988,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_unthrottle(struct pe
 				cpuc->events[hwc->idx] != event))
 		return;
 
-	x86_pmu.enable(hwc, hwc->idx);
+	x86_pmu.enable(event);
 }
 
 void perf_event_print_debug(void)
@@ -1054,7 +1053,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_eve
 	 * could reenable again:
 	 */
 	clear_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask);
-	x86_pmu.disable(hwc, idx);
+	x86_pmu.disable(event);
 
 	/*
 	 * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
@@ -1123,7 +1122,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_
 			continue;
 
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, regs))
-			x86_pmu.disable(hwc, idx);
+			x86_pmu.disable(event);
 	}
 
 	if (handled)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -548,9 +548,9 @@ static inline void intel_pmu_ack_status(
 }
 
 static inline void
-intel_pmu_disable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int __idx)
+intel_pmu_disable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
 {
-	int idx = __idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
+	int idx = hwc->idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
 	u64 ctrl_val, mask;
 
 	mask = 0xfULL << (idx * 4);
@@ -622,26 +622,28 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(v
 }
 
 static inline void
-intel_pmu_disable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	if (unlikely(idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+
+	if (unlikely(hwc->idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
 		intel_pmu_disable_bts();
 		intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer();
 		return;
 	}
 
 	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL)) {
-		intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc, idx);
+		intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	x86_pmu_disable_event(hwc, idx);
+	x86_pmu_disable_event(event);
 }
 
 static inline void
-intel_pmu_enable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int __idx)
+intel_pmu_enable_fixed(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
 {
-	int idx = __idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
+	int idx = hwc->idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
 	u64 ctrl_val, bits, mask;
 	int err;
 
@@ -671,9 +673,11 @@ intel_pmu_enable_fixed(struct hw_perf_ev
 	err = checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base, ctrl_val);
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	if (unlikely(idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+
+	if (unlikely(hwc->idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)) {
 		if (!__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events).enabled)
 			return;
 
@@ -682,11 +686,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struc
 	}
 
 	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL)) {
-		intel_pmu_enable_fixed(hwc, idx);
+		intel_pmu_enable_fixed(hwc);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc, idx);
+	__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -774,7 +778,7 @@ again:
 		data.period = event->hw.last_period;
 
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, 1, &data, regs))
-			intel_pmu_disable_event(&event->hw, bit);
+			intel_pmu_disable_event(event);
 	}
 
 	intel_pmu_ack_status(ack);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p6.c
@@ -77,27 +77,29 @@ static void p6_pmu_enable_all(void)
 }
 
 static inline void
-p6_pmu_disable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+p6_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	u64 val = P6_NOP_EVENT;
 
 	if (cpuc->enabled)
 		val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
 
-	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + idx, val);
+	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, val);
 }
 
-static void p6_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+static void p6_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	u64 val;
 
 	val = hwc->config;
 	if (cpuc->enabled)
 		val |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
 
-	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + idx, val);
+	(void)checking_wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, val);
 }
 
 static __initconst struct x86_pmu p6_pmu = {

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49   ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05  8:44   ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38   ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 17:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  8:50       ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55         ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18           ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  2:59           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09  1:41             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100303164306.072186867@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.