All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	eranian@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:38:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100303173802.GL13205@erda.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303164306.299625712@chello.nl>

On 03.03.10 17:39:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Implement a simple PEBS model that always takes a single PEBS event at
> a time. This is done so that the interaction with the rest of the
> system is as expected (freq adjust, period randomization, lbr).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---

[...]

> +static int validate_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *fake_cpuc;
> +	struct event_constraint *c;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	fake_cpuc = kmalloc(sizeof(*fake_cpuc), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	if (!fake_cpuc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	c = x86_pmu.get_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);
> +
> +	if (!c || !c->weight)
> +		ret = -ENOSPC;
> +
> +	if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
> +		x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(fake_cpuc, event);

A fake cpu with the struct filled with zeros will cause a null pointer
exception in amd_get_event_constraints():

	struct amd_nb *nb = cpuc->amd_nb;

Shouldn't x86_schedule_events() sufficient to decide if a single
counter is available? I did not yet look at group events, this might
happen there too.

-Robert

> +
> +	kfree(fake_cpuc);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * validate a single event group
>   *
>   * validation include:
> @@ -1495,6 +1426,8 @@ const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(str
>  
>  		if (event->group_leader != event)
>  			err = validate_group(event);
> +		else
> +			err = validate_event(event);
>  
>  		event->pmu = tmp;
>  	}

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@amd.com


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-03 16:39 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] Another stab at PEBS and LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_set_period() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update() Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] perf, x86: Change x86_pmu.{enable,disable} calling convention Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf, x86: Use unlocked bitops Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: Generic perf_sample_data initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 16:49   ` David Miller
2010-03-03 21:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05  8:44   ` Jean Pihet
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf, x86: PEBS infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:38   ` Robert Richter [this message]
2010-03-03 17:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  8:50       ` Robert Richter
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Provide PERF_SAMPLE_REGS Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:30   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 17:49       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 17:55         ` David Miller
2010-03-03 18:18           ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 19:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04  2:59           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-04 12:58             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-03-03 22:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 11:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf, x86: Implement simple LBR support Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:52   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:57   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 17:54       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04 18:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 20:57             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf, x86: Implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:08   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 18:05   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 19:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-03 21:11       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-03-03 21:50         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-04  8:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09  1:41             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-03 16:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf, x86: Clean up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES usage Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100303173802.GL13205@erda.amd.com \
    --to=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.