From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, LVM2 development <lvm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: edits for r16 of shared snapshot patches [was: Re: userspace patches for shared snapshots]
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:47:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100305174747.GA777@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100304132228.GA20534@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 04 2010 at 8:22am -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04 2010 at 5:11am -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I went through your kernel patch and uploaded a new version at
> > http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/new-snapshots/r16/ . It
> > contains fix for this 100% usage. It contains most of your changes (I
> > rolled back that cycle change).
>
> OK, I have made further edits that layered ontop of my other changes
> (primarily just making use of __func__ rather than hardcoding the
> function name in ERROR messages). I'll have a look at your r16 and
> hopefully they'll apply there too.
I've uploaded my edits to r16 here:
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/multisnap/kernel/2.6.33/r16a/
You can see the edits here:
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/multisnap/kernel/2.6.33/r16a/r16_edits.patch
Boils down to:
* use __func__ rather than hardcoding the function name
- this fixed ~3 inconsistencies (incorrect function names) and should
help if/when we do any function renaming in later phases of review
* s/Tomonorig/Tomonori/
* a few more typo fixups
* a few more whitespace cleanups.
I'd appreciate it if you pull these in for the basis of any follow-on
release you make.
Also, I'm working to improve Documentation/device-mapper/dm-multisnapshot.txt
I'll share this a bit later (hopefully today).
Mike
--
lvm-devel mailing list
lvm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/lvm-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: edits for r16 of shared snapshot patches [was: Re: userspace patches for shared snapshots]
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:47:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100305174747.GA777@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100304132228.GA20534@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 04 2010 at 8:22am -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04 2010 at 5:11am -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I went through your kernel patch and uploaded a new version at
> > http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/new-snapshots/r16/ . It
> > contains fix for this 100% usage. It contains most of your changes (I
> > rolled back that cycle change).
>
> OK, I have made further edits that layered ontop of my other changes
> (primarily just making use of __func__ rather than hardcoding the
> function name in ERROR messages). I'll have a look at your r16 and
> hopefully they'll apply there too.
I've uploaded my edits to r16 here:
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/multisnap/kernel/2.6.33/r16a/
You can see the edits here:
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/multisnap/kernel/2.6.33/r16a/r16_edits.patch
Boils down to:
* use __func__ rather than hardcoding the function name
- this fixed ~3 inconsistencies (incorrect function names) and should
help if/when we do any function renaming in later phases of review
* s/Tomonorig/Tomonori/
* a few more typo fixups
* a few more whitespace cleanups.
I'd appreciate it if you pull these in for the basis of any follow-on
release you make.
Also, I'm working to improve Documentation/device-mapper/dm-multisnapshot.txt
I'll share this a bit later (hopefully today).
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-10 23:59 userspace patches for shared snapshots Mikulas Patocka
2010-02-25 22:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-02-26 4:52 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-02-26 21:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-03-03 22:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-03-04 10:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-03-04 13:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-03-05 17:47 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-03-05 17:47 ` edits for r16 of shared snapshot patches [was: Re: userspace patches for shared snapshots] Mike Snitzer
2010-03-09 8:41 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-03-09 8:41 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-03-10 20:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-03-09 3:18 ` userspace patches for shared snapshots Mikulas Patocka
2010-03-09 3:38 ` Alasdair G Kergon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100305174747.GA777@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.