All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	a.gruenbacher@computer.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:40:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310114035.GA32219@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1003021845310.1594@tundra.namei.org>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:01:05PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> I audited the kernel for users of the trusted xattr namespace, and found 
> the following filesystems not checking for CAP_SYS_ADMIN:
> 
>   - jffs2
>   - ocfs2
>   - btrfs
>   - xfs

Now that everyone felt the consensus is that we need the check I look
into adding it into XFS, but it seems like we already have that check
in xfs_xattr_put_listent:

	/*
         * Only show root namespace entries if we are actually allowed to
	 * see them.
	 */
	if ((flags & XFS_ATTR_ROOT) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
		return 0;

Can you send me the testcases where XFs shows trusted attributes?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-02  8:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs James Morris
2010-03-02  8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] jffs2: ensure trusted xattrs are not returned to unprivileged users via listxattr James Morris
2010-03-02  8:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: " James Morris
2010-03-02  9:29   ` Joel Becker
2010-03-02 22:01     ` James Morris
2010-03-02 23:15     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-02 23:15       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-02  8:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Correct behavior for listxattr and 'trusted' xattrs Andreas Dilger
2010-03-03 13:02 ` Stephen Smalley
2010-03-10 11:48   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-03 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-10 11:26   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-10 11:40 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-03-10 14:04   ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100310114035.GA32219@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=a.gruenbacher@computer.org \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.