All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310142832.GB24422@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded01003100514r70f0f53eydda7b916f92bef64@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:14:42AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 75fe4b02234f6476e72827508f11f1035d7aaf68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:32:43 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
> 
> Support ssp in pxa168. The basic function of SSP is same as pxa, but clock
> source and IRQ is changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

That said might it make sense to merge this and the previous patch via
ASoC since there's new drivers using this following on and Liam's
multi-codec work is likely to be creating merge issues this development
cycle?  I can apply the patches on a branch by themselves which can also
be pulled into the PXA tree if needed.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:28:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100310142832.GB24422@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <771cded01003100514r70f0f53eydda7b916f92bef64@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:14:42AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> From 75fe4b02234f6476e72827508f11f1035d7aaf68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:32:43 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] mmp: support ssp in pxa168
> 
> Support ssp in pxa168. The basic function of SSP is same as pxa, but clock
> source and IRQ is changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

That said might it make sense to merge this and the previous patch via
ASoC since there's new drivers using this following on and Liam's
multi-codec work is likely to be creating merge issues this development
cycle?  I can apply the patches on a branch by themselves which can also
be pulled into the PXA tree if needed.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-10 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-10 13:14 [PATCH 2/4] mmp: support ssp in pxa168 Haojian Zhuang
2010-03-10 13:14 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-03-10 14:28 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2010-03-10 14:28   ` Mark Brown
2010-03-11  8:20   ` Eric Miao
2010-03-11  8:20     ` Eric Miao
2010-03-11 10:58     ` Mark Brown
2010-03-11 10:58       ` Mark Brown
2010-03-11 11:11       ` Liam Girdwood
2010-03-11 11:11         ` [alsa-devel] " Liam Girdwood
2010-03-16 11:49 ` Eric Miao
2010-03-16 11:49   ` Eric Miao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100310142832.GB24422@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.