From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Smith <danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org,
davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Make restore_obj() tolerate a preexisting object in the hash (v2)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:04:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100319000434.GA5505@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268945512-18814-2-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Quoting Dan Smith (danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org):
> ... as long as the pointer is the same as that returned from the restore
> function. Also move the compulsory ref_drop() so that it only gets
> done if we created the new object.
>
> The existing object tolerance is important for netdev restore because it
> means that I can refer to a peer by its objref instead of needing the
> (previously-rejected) veth_peer() function. If this is not acceptable,
> then I'll need to keep a separate list of pairs.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Check that the type of the object already in the hash matches that
> of the objref header we're reading.
> - Add a comment about why and how we might get into this sort of
> situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> checkpoint/objhash.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/checkpoint/objhash.c b/checkpoint/objhash.c
> index 7208382..65875e3 100644
> --- a/checkpoint/objhash.c
> +++ b/checkpoint/objhash.c
> @@ -1064,16 +1064,29 @@ int restore_obj(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx, struct ckpt_hdr_objref *h)
> if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> return PTR_ERR(ptr);
>
> - if (obj_find_by_objref(ctx, h->objref))
> - obj = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> - else
> + obj = obj_find_by_objref(ctx, h->objref);
> + if (!obj) {
> obj = obj_new(ctx, ptr, h->objref, h->objtype);
> - /*
> - * Drop an extra reference to the object returned by ops->restore:
> - * On success, this clears the extra reference taken by obj_new(),
> - * and on failure, this cleans up the object itself.
> - */
> - ops->ref_drop(ptr, 0);
> + /*
> + * Drop an extra reference to the object returned by
> + * ops->restore: On success, this clears the extra
> + * reference taken by obj_new(), and on failure, this
> + * cleans up the object itself.
I don't think this part of the comment is quite right here. The
"on failure this cleans up the object itself" really is for the
ref_drop under IS_ERR() check below.
The ref_drop here is for the ref taken by obj_new(), which is only
done in this path of course.
> + */
> + ops->ref_drop(ptr, 0);
> + } else if ((obj->ptr != ptr) || (obj->ops->obj_type != h->objtype)) {
> + /* Normally, we expect an object to not already exist
> + * in the hash. However, for some special scenarios
> + * where we're restoring sets of objects that must be
> + * co-allocated (such, as veth netdev pairs) we need
> + * to tolerate this case if the second restore returns
> + * the correct type and pointer, as specified in the
> + * existing object. If either of those don't match,
> + * we fail.
> + */
> + obj = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
Here point out that we are putting the reference taken by
ops->restore(). If obj is not an error, then we keep an
extra ref to pin obj while it is on the hash.
> ops->ref_drop(ptr, 1);
> return PTR_ERR(obj);
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 20:51 C/R netdev and netns support Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1268945512-18814-1-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] Make restore_obj() tolerate a preexisting object in the hash (v2) Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1268945512-18814-2-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-19 0:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
[not found] ` <20100319000434.GA5505-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-19 15:01 ` Dan Smith
[not found] ` <8739zwgxua.fsf-FLMGYpZoEPULwtHQx/6qkW3U47Q5hpJU@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-19 15:21 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] Add checkpoint and collect hooks to net_device_ops Dan Smith
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] C/R: Basic support for network namespaces and devices (v6) Dan Smith
[not found] ` <1268945512-18814-4-git-send-email-danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-19 0:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-03-19 15:15 ` Dan Smith
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] Add checkpoint support for veth devices (v2) Dan Smith
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 5/7] Add loopback checkpoint support (v2) Dan Smith
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] Add a checkpoint handler to the 'sit' device Dan Smith
2010-03-18 20:51 ` [PATCH 7/7] Add checkpoint support to macvlan driver Dan Smith
2010-03-30 4:53 ` C/R netdev and netns support Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100319000434.GA5505@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue-r/jw6+rmf7hqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.