From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: amwang@redhat.com
Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mpm@selenic.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:57:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100322.215703.77339158.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA84607.7030304@redhat.com>
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:35 +0800
> How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to
> the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will
> be complex, I am afraid.
Why does this matter at all?
I told you in another mail that we should do away with
these callbacks and all the crazy 'npinfo' assignments
and just do it in the generic code.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: amwang@redhat.com
Cc: mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
gospo@redhat.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fubar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:57:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100322.215703.77339158.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA84607.7030304@redhat.com>
From: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:35 +0800
> How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to
> the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will
> be complex, I am afraid.
Why does this matter at all?
I told you in another mail that we should do away with
these callbacks and all the crazy 'npinfo' assignments
and just do it in the generic code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-23 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-22 8:17 [Bridge] [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 22:35 ` [Bridge] " Matt Mackall
2010-03-22 22:35 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 2:03 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 2:03 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:27 ` [Bridge] " Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:27 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:39 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:39 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:51 ` [Bridge] " Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:51 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 4:59 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2010-03-23 4:59 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:00 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 5:00 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:57 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-03-23 4:57 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:06 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 5:06 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` [Bridge] [RFC Patch 3/3] bonding: make bonding " Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 8:17 ` Amerigo Wang
2010-03-22 22:38 ` [Bridge] " Matt Mackall
2010-03-22 22:38 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-22 23:36 ` [Bridge] " Jay Vosburgh
2010-03-22 23:36 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-03-23 2:01 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 2:01 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 0:56 ` [Bridge] " Andy Gospodarek
2010-03-23 0:56 ` Andy Gospodarek
2010-03-23 1:49 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 1:49 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-22 22:31 ` [Bridge] [RFC Patch 1/3] netpoll: add generic support for bridge and bonding devices Matt Mackall
2010-03-22 22:31 ` Matt Mackall
2010-03-23 2:13 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 2:13 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 3:49 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2010-03-23 3:49 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 4:47 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:47 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 4:58 ` [Bridge] " David Miller
2010-03-23 4:58 ` David Miller
2010-03-23 5:15 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-23 5:15 ` Cong Wang
2010-03-23 12:11 ` [Bridge] " Jeff Moyer
2010-03-23 12:11 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-03-24 2:29 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2010-03-24 2:29 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100322.215703.77339158.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.