diff for duplicates of <20100330172542.GI2513@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 87e894e..60db6b2 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,29 +1,26 @@ On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:31PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: -> Le mardi 30 mars 2010 =E0 09:49 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a =E9crit : +> Le mardi 30 mars 2010 à 09:49 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:39:11PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: -> > >=20 -> > > > Scrap this one -- Arnd has it covered, under the much better na= -me +> > > +> > > > Scrap this one -- Arnd has it covered, under the much better name > > > > of rcu_dereference_const(). -> > >=20 -> > > Not convinced of that name either. That sounds like the RCU dere= -ference of +> > > +> > > Not convinced of that name either. That sounds like the RCU dereference of > > > constant (R/O) data. -> >=20 +> > > > Which it is, as long as the lock is held. -> >=20 +> > > > But what name would you suggest? -> >=20 ->=20 +> > +> > Maybe use 'protected' word or something like that, or 'owned', ... ->=20 +> > rcu_dereference_protected() or rcu_dereference_owned() I do like rcu_dereference_protected() -- a bit longer than rcu_dereference_locked(), but covers the initialization and cleanup -accesses that might be protected by privatization rather than by lockin= -g. +accesses that might be protected by privatization rather than by locking. Other thoughts? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index bd6d4e2..7929385 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -19,34 +19,31 @@ "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:04:31PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:\n" - "> Le mardi 30 mars 2010 =E0 09:49 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a =E9crit :\n" + "> Le mardi 30 mars 2010 \303\240 09:49 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a \303\251crit :\n" "> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:39:11PM +0100, David Howells wrote:\n" "> > > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:\n" - "> > >=20\n" - "> > > > Scrap this one -- Arnd has it covered, under the much better na=\n" - "me\n" + "> > > \n" + "> > > > Scrap this one -- Arnd has it covered, under the much better name\n" "> > > > of rcu_dereference_const().\n" - "> > >=20\n" - "> > > Not convinced of that name either. That sounds like the RCU dere=\n" - "ference of\n" + "> > > \n" + "> > > Not convinced of that name either. That sounds like the RCU dereference of\n" "> > > constant (R/O) data.\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > Which it is, as long as the lock is held.\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > But what name would you suggest?\n" - "> >=20\n" - ">=20\n" + "> > \n" + "> \n" "> Maybe use 'protected' word or something like that, or 'owned', ...\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> rcu_dereference_protected() or rcu_dereference_owned()\n" "\n" "I do like rcu_dereference_protected() -- a bit longer than\n" "rcu_dereference_locked(), but covers the initialization and cleanup\n" - "accesses that might be protected by privatization rather than by lockin=\n" - "g.\n" + "accesses that might be protected by privatization rather than by locking.\n" "\n" "Other thoughts?\n" "\n" "\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThanx, Paul" -5ff5f2607f3aabed4bf487acd1ae38a602616b39ee55a23d699c8ceb7dfdd677 +8dc4e8d7f46999824a42924e3e3b8bd228ff5ab02db8a8a9f58f081eae02a0c9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.