[PATCH] Staging: batman-adv: fix whitespace coding style issue in proc.c This is a patch to the proc.c file that fixes several whitespace warnings found by the checkpatch.pl tool Signed-off by: Dan Milway <dan.milway@gmail.com>

[PATCH] Staging: batman-adv: fix whitespace coding style issue in proc.c This is a patch to the proc.c file that fixes several whitespace warnings found by the checkpatch.pl tool Signed-off by: Dan Milway <dan.milway@gmail.com>

[Dan Milway]

---
 drivers/staging/batman-adv/proc.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/batman-adv/proc.c b/drivers/staging/batman-adv/proc.c
index 7de60e8..1c51a05 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/batman-adv/proc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/batman-adv/proc.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int proc_interfaces_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(batman_if, &if_list, list) {
-		seq_printf(seq, "[%8s] %s %s \n",
+		seq_printf(seq, "[%8s] %s %s\n",
 			   (batman_if->if_active == IF_ACTIVE ?
 			    "active" : "inactive"),
 			   batman_if->dev,
@@ -188,18 +188,18 @@ static int proc_originators_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (list_empty(&if_list)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it \n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it\n");
 		goto end;
 	}
 
 	if (((struct batman_if *)if_list.next)->if_active != IF_ACTIVE) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - primary interface not active \n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - primary interface not active\n");
 		goto end;
 	}
 
 	seq_printf(seq,
-		   "  %-14s (%s/%i) %17s [%10s]: %20s ... [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv %s%s, MainIF/MAC: %s/%s] \n",
+		   "  %-14s (%s/%i) %17s [%10s]: %20s ... [B.A.T.M.A.N. adv %s%s, MainIF/MAC: %s/%s]\n",
 		   "Originator", "#", TQ_MAX_VALUE, "Nexthop", "outgoingIF",
 		   "Potential nexthops", SOURCE_VERSION, REVISION_VERSION_STR,
 		   ((struct batman_if *)if_list.next)->dev,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int proc_originators_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&orig_hash_lock, flags);
 
 	if (batman_count == 0)
-		seq_printf(seq, "No batman nodes in range ... \n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "No batman nodes in range ...\n");
 
 end:
 	return 0;
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static int proc_transt_local_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (list_empty(&if_list)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it \n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it\n");
 		goto end;
 	}
 
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int proc_transt_global_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (list_empty(&if_list)) {
 		rcu_read_unlock();
-		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it \n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "BATMAN disabled - please specify interfaces to enable it\n");
 		goto end;
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -350,9 +350,9 @@ static int proc_vis_srv_read(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
 {
 	int vis_server = atomic_read(&vis_mode);
 
-	seq_printf(seq, "[%c] client mode (server disabled) \n",
+	seq_printf(seq, "[%c] client mode (server disabled)\n",
 			(vis_server == VIS_TYPE_CLIENT_UPDATE) ? 'x' : ' ');
-	seq_printf(seq, "[%c] server mode (server enabled) \n",
+	seq_printf(seq, "[%c] server mode (server enabled)\n",
 			(vis_server == VIS_TYPE_SERVER_SYNC) ? 'x' : ' ');
 
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.0

Re: [PATCH] Staging: batman-adv: fix whitespace coding style issue in proc.c This is a patch to the proc.c file that fixes several whitespace warnings found by the checkpatch.pl tool Signed-off by: Dan Milway <dan.milway@gmail.com>

[Andrew Lunn]

Hi Dan

Thanks for the patch.

I think all of these have already been fixed in a patch i sent to Greg
for the next -rc kernel. There is a bug proc.c, and while fixing the
bug i took the time to fix these white space things as well.

Please could you check this file again after the next -rc kernel is
released?

	Thanks
		Andrew