From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
AKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Memory corruption with 2.6.32.10, but not with 2.6.34-rc3
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100405105957.GA2302@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100401165857.GN30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:51:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >
> > > I can cherry-pick things if anyone pin-points something and run
> > > lont-time tests again. Any pointer appreciated.
> >
> > Oh, how about running 'git bisect' to try to find the solution? Just
> > remember to reverse 'good' and 'bad' for when you tell git bisect what
> > the results are.
>
> Jep, I thought about that of course. But unfortunately, the platform
> got merged mainline in the middle of that time window which makes
> bisecting tricky. And worse than that - every test run take around half
> a day at least :(
What you can do is backport the platform-support on top of rev initially
marked good (in a branch named say foo) and when asked for testing do:
git merge --no-commit foo
<test>
git reset --hard
git bisect {good|bad}
Assuming the platform-support got in in one go (and you shouldn't test
in the middle, which you can simply skip), the merge should always work
just fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Memory corruption with 2.6.32.10, but not with 2.6.34-rc3
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100405105957.GA2302@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100401165857.GN30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:51:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >
> > > I can cherry-pick things if anyone pin-points something and run
> > > lont-time tests again. Any pointer appreciated.
> >
> > Oh, how about running 'git bisect' to try to find the solution? Just
> > remember to reverse 'good' and 'bad' for when you tell git bisect what
> > the results are.
>
> Jep, I thought about that of course. But unfortunately, the platform
> got merged mainline in the middle of that time window which makes
> bisecting tricky. And worse than that - every test run take around half
> a day at least :(
What you can do is backport the platform-support on top of rev initially
marked good (in a branch named say foo) and when asked for testing do:
git merge --no-commit foo
<test>
git reset --hard
git bisect {good|bad}
Assuming the platform-support got in in one go (and you shouldn't test
in the middle, which you can simply skip), the merge should always work
just fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-01 13:21 Memory corruption with 2.6.32.10, but not with 2.6.34-rc3 Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 13:21 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 16:50 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 16:50 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 17:00 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 17:00 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 16:51 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 16:51 ` Greg KH
2010-04-01 16:58 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 16:58 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-05 10:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-04-05 10:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-04-01 17:29 ` Anders Grafström
2010-04-01 17:29 ` Anders Grafström
2010-04-01 17:57 ` Daniel Mack
2010-04-01 17:57 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100405105957.GA2302@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=daniel@caiaq.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.neumann@raumfeld.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.