diff for duplicates of <20100407114411.GB5143@nowhere> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2e5c269..4fe0e74 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c -> > > =================================================================== -> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c +> > > =================================> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c > > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c > > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu) > > > unsigned long long clock; @@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > That seem to add a small overhead in various places. -> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save +> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi = local_irq_save > > for archs that have native nmi? > > That is already so, see 1/3. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 950c350..e939d55 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ "ref\01270639894.20295.749.camel@laptop\0" "From\0Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock()\0" - "Date\0Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:44:14 +0200\0" + "Date\0Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:44:14 +0000\0" "To\0Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>\0" "Cc\0mingo@elte.hu" David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> @@ -29,8 +29,7 @@ "> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)\n" "> > > \n" "> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c\n" - "> > > ===================================================================\n" - "> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c\n" + "> > > =================================> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c\n" "> > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c\n" "> > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)\n" "> > > \tunsigned long long clock;\n" @@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ "> > \n" "> > \n" "> > That seem to add a small overhead in various places.\n" - "> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save\n" + "> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi = local_irq_save\n" "> > for archs that have native nmi?\n" "> \n" "> That is already so, see 1/3.\n" @@ -55,4 +54,4 @@ "\n" Ah you're right. -6f51aa48d381712bf81116582f2f65b1d831774678c8c4885c416af936a25538 +6dcc7d4e7e6e34f789280eb9c9c84cf8ef599279756934c433850235007f1e4f
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.