From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
acme@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock()
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:44:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407114411.GB5143@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270639894.20295.749.camel@laptop>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:27 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Since we can call cpu_clock() from NMI context fix up the IRQ
> > > disabling to conform to the new rules.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
> > > unsigned long long clock;
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > - local_irq_save(flags);
> > > + local_irq_save_nmi(flags);
> > > clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> > > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > > + local_irq_restore_nmi(flags);
> > >
> > > return clock;
> > > }
> >
> >
> > That seem to add a small overhead in various places.
> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi == local_irq_save
> > for archs that have native nmi?
>
> That is already so, see 1/3.
Ah you're right.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
acme@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock()
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:44:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407114411.GB5143@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270639894.20295.749.camel@laptop>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 13:27 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:28:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Since we can call cpu_clock() from NMI context fix up the IRQ
> > > disabling to conform to the new rules.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > =================================> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
> > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
> > > unsigned long long clock;
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > - local_irq_save(flags);
> > > + local_irq_save_nmi(flags);
> > > clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
> > > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > > + local_irq_restore_nmi(flags);
> > >
> > > return clock;
> > > }
> >
> >
> > That seem to add a small overhead in various places.
> > Do we want to make local_irq_save_nmi = local_irq_save
> > for archs that have native nmi?
>
> That is already so, see 1/3.
Ah you're right.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 13:28 [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 1/3] kernel: local_irq_{save,restore}_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 1:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-07 1:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-07 1:19 ` David Miller
2010-04-07 1:19 ` David Miller
2010-04-07 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-07 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 2/3] perf: Use local_irq_save_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [patch 3/3] sched: Use local_irq_save_nmi() in cpu_clock() Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 13:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-07 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-07 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-07 11:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-04-07 11:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06 17:54 ` [patch 0/3] IRQ disable vs NMI David Miller
2010-04-06 17:54 ` David Miller
2010-04-06 23:39 ` David Miller
2010-04-06 23:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100407114411.GB5143@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.