All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rishikesh K Rajak <risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, kamimura@ryobi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:24:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100415065440.GA6261@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001301cadc36$77e08cf0$67a1a6d0$@co.jp>

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:56:22AM +0900, Mitani wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:31 PM
> > To: Mitani
> > Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests
> > 
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yanegomi@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:18 PM
> > >> To: Mitani
> > >> Cc: Randy Dunlap; ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp> wrote:
> > >> > Hi Randy,
> > >> >
> > >> > I couldn't notice a misspelling. Sorry.
> > >> > I decided to use "due to" according to your advice.
> > >> >
> > >> > May I suggest revised patch?
> > >> >
> > > [...]
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you--
> > >> >
> > >> > -Tomonori Mitani
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> >> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdunlap@xenotime.net]
> > >> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:04 AM
> > >> >> To: Mitani
> > >> >> Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> >> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 04/12/10 23:58, Mitani wrote:
> > >> >> > ------------
> > >> >> >  a) All tests:
> > >> >> > "TBROK  :  Test cannot be continued owning to sufficient
> > >> >> availability of
> > >> >> > Hugepages on the system"
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >  b) 2), 3), 5), 6), 8), 10), 11) tests:
> > >> >> > "TWARN  :  tst_rmdir(): TESTDIR was NULL; no removal
> > attempted"
> > >> >> > ------------
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Both case a) and case b) are caused by the same reason.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > All of case a) failures occured at the following points (for
> > >> example
> > >> >> > hugemmap04):
> > >> >> > ------------<hugemmap04.c - main()>
> > >> >> >         /* Check number of hugepages */
> > >> >> >         if (get_no_of_hugepages() <= 0 || hugepages_size()
> > <=
> > >> 0)
> > >> >> >                 tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "Test cannot be
> > >> continued
> > >> >> owning to
> > >> >> > \
> > >> >> >                                 sufficient availability
> > of
> > >> >> Hugepages on the
> > >> >> > system");
> > >> >> > ------------
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I found out that "HugePages_Total" parameter of "/proc/meminfo"
> > >> file
> > >> >> > is set to "0". This caused above TBROK failure. It is environment
> > >> >> problem.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > But, in this case, tests must not return with TBROK, but with
> > TCONF,
> > >> >> > I think.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> That makes sense to me.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > And, in case b), these tests try to delete "TESTDIR" directory
> > >> by
> > >> >> > calling "tst_rmdir()" function in "cleanup()" function.
> > >> >> > But, "TESTDIR" never set if "tst_tmpdir()" function isn't
> > called.
> > >> >> > I think that case b)'s tests must not call cleanup() function.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I want to suggest following patch.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Tomonori Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
> > 
> >     Sorry to ask again, but Gmail always mangles patches. Could you
> > please attach it as a file?
> > Thanks,
> > -Garrett
> 
> 
> Sorry.
> I attach a patch file.


Applied to next branch. Will wait for someone to Acked/test it before merging to 
master.

Thanks
-Rishi

> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomonori Mitani <mitani@ryobi.co.jp>
> 
> 
> Regards--
> 
> -Tomonori Mitani


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


-- 
Thanks & Regards
Rishi
LTP Maintainer
IBM, LTC, Bangalore
Please join IRC #ltp @ irc.freenode.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-13  6:58 [LTP] [PATCH] fix "hugetlb" several tests Mitani
2010-04-13 15:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-14  2:17   ` Mitani
2010-04-14  6:17     ` Garrett Cooper
2010-04-14  8:58       ` Mitani
2010-04-14  9:18         ` Ryan Wang
2010-04-14  9:30         ` Garrett Cooper
2010-04-15  0:56           ` Mitani
2010-04-15  6:54             ` Rishikesh K Rajak [this message]
2010-04-15  8:42               ` Garrett Cooper
2010-04-16  1:33                 ` Mitani
2010-04-16  5:15                   ` Garrett Cooper
2010-04-14 15:19         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-16  2:42           ` Mitani
2010-04-16  5:05             ` Garrett Cooper
2010-04-16  9:23               ` Mitani
2010-04-16 15:12             ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100415065440.GA6261@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=risrajak@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamimura@ryobi.co.jp \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mitani@ryobi.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.