From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] sched: eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:02:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100418120258.09c95042@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100418115949.7b743898@infradead.org>
>From 526a9f347d5a953f37b67b4b2afb39d7b4d77a92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:49:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] sched: eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field
Now that the only user of ts->idle_lastupdate is update_ts_time_stats(),
the entire field can be eliminated.
In update_ts_time_stats(), idle_lastupdate is first set to "now",
and a few lines later, the only user is an if() statement that
assigns a variable either to "now" or to ts->idle_lastupdate,
which has the value of "now" at that point.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 1 -
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index d2ae79e..0343eed 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
ktime_t idle_waketime;
ktime_t idle_exittime;
ktime_t idle_sleeptime;
- ktime_t idle_lastupdate;
ktime_t sleep_length;
unsigned long last_jiffies;
unsigned long next_jiffies;
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index ac54543..326f5f8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -158,16 +158,13 @@ update_ts_time_stats(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now, u64 *last_update_time)
{
ktime_t delta;
- ts->idle_lastupdate = now;
if (ts->idle_active) {
delta = ktime_sub(now, ts->idle_entrytime);
ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
ts->idle_entrytime = now;
}
- if (ts->idle_active && last_update_time)
- *last_update_time = ktime_to_us(ts->idle_lastupdate);
- else
+ if (last_update_time)
*last_update_time = ktime_to_us(now);
}
--
1.6.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-18 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-18 18:59 [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-18 19:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched: add a comment to get_cpu_idle_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 19:25 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: introduce a function to update the idle statistics Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:11 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: update the idle statistics in get_cpu_idle_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: fold updating of the last update time into update_ts_time_stats() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:58 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:02 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2010-04-26 21:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: introduce get_cpu_iowait_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 21:05 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 8:29 ` Éric Piel
2010-04-19 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 14:30 ` Éric Piel
2010-04-19 14:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 9:24 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-04-27 0:29 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-27 13:01 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-27 18:10 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-19 9:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-19 13:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 15:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-20 0:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-20 11:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-28 8:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-23 5:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-20 9:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-04-20 11:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 5:24 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-23 5:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-04-23 8:50 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-04-23 16:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-27 11:39 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-05-04 3:48 ` [PATCH 8/7] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs tunable Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-04 4:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-05-04 5:43 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-04 13:51 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-23 14:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 15:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-04-23 13:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 8:38 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-23 16:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-24 4:56 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-01 23:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 21:30 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 21:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor Dave Jones
2010-04-26 21:45 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-04-26 21:59 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 22:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100418120258.09c95042@infradead.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.