All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:05:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420150522.GG19264@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCCD8BD.1020307@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:27:09AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Christoph.
> 
> On 04/20/2010 02:38 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > alloc_pages_exact_node results in more confusion because it does suggest
> > that fallback to other nodes is not allowed.
> 
> I can't see why alloc_pages_exact_node() exists at all.  It's in the
> mainline and if you look at the difference between alloc_pages_node()
> and alloc_pages_exact_node(), it's almost silly.  :-(
> 

alloc_pages_exact_node() avoids a branch in a hot path that is checking for
something the caller already knows. That's the reason it exists.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:05:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420150522.GG19264@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCCD8BD.1020307@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:27:09AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Christoph.
> 
> On 04/20/2010 02:38 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > alloc_pages_exact_node results in more confusion because it does suggest
> > that fallback to other nodes is not allowed.
> 
> I can't see why alloc_pages_exact_node() exists at all.  It's in the
> mainline and if you look at the difference between alloc_pages_node()
> and alloc_pages_exact_node(), it's almost silly.  :-(
> 

alloc_pages_exact_node() avoids a branch in a hot path that is checking for
something the caller already knows. That's the reason it exists.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-20 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-13 15:24 [PATCH 1/6] Remove node's validity check in alloc_pages Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:24 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:24   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:48     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14 23:39     ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-14 23:39       ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15  1:31       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  1:31         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  7:21         ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15  7:21           ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15  8:00           ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  8:00             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  8:15             ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15  8:15               ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15  9:40               ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15  9:40                 ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:08                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 10:08                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 10:21                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:21                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:33                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 10:33                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 11:43                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 11:43                       ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-15 11:49                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-15 11:49                         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-16 16:07                         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-16 16:07                           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-16 19:13                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-16 19:13                             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-18 15:55                             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 15:55                               ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 15:54                           ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 15:54                             ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-18 21:22                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-18 21:22                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-19  0:03                               ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-19 17:45                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-20  0:20                                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-20  0:20                                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-19 17:38                             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-19 17:38                               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-19 22:27                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-19 22:27                                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-20 15:05                                 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-04-20 15:05                                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-21 10:48                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-21 10:48                                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-22 10:15                                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-22 10:15                                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-21 14:15                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-21 14:15                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-21 17:06                                     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-21 17:06                                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] change alloc function in alloc_slab_page Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:52   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:52     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:01     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:01       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:14       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:14         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 21:37   ` David Rientjes
2010-04-13 21:37     ` David Rientjes
2010-04-13 23:40     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 23:40       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 23:55       ` David Rientjes
2010-04-13 23:55         ` David Rientjes
2010-04-14  0:02         ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  0:02           ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  0:18   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  0:18     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14 12:23     ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-14 12:23       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-16 16:10       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-16 16:10         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-18 18:49         ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-18 18:49           ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-19  9:05         ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19  9:05           ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] change alloc function in vmemmap_alloc_block Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:59   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:59     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14  0:19   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  0:19     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] change alloc function in __vmalloc_area_node Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:02   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:02     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14  0:22   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  0:22     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  0:33     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-14  0:33       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] Add comment in alloc_pages_exact_node Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:25   ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:13   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:13     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 16:20     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 16:20       ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-13 15:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] Remove node's validity check in alloc_pages Mel Gorman
2010-04-13 15:32   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-14  0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-14  0:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100420150522.GG19264@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.