Re: [PATCH BUG-FIX] ipv6: allow to send packet after receiving

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:55:35 +0800

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:58:22AM +0800, Shan Wei wrote:
>> 
>> According to RFC2460, PMTU is set to the IPv6 Minimum Link
>> MTU (1280) and a fragment header should always be included
>> after a node receiving Too Big message reporting PMTU is
>> less than the IPv6 Minimum Link MTU.
>> 
>> After receiving a ICMPv6 Too Big message reporting PMTU is
>> less than the IPv6 Minimum Link MTU, sctp *can't* send any
>> data/control chunk that total length including IPv6 head 
>> and IPv6 extend head is less than IPV6_MIN_MTU(1280 bytes).
>> 
>> The failure occured in p6_fragment(), about reason 
>> see following(take SHUTDOWN chunk for example):
>> sctp_packet_transmit (SHUTDOWN chunk, len\x16 byte)
>> |------sctp_v6_xmit (local_df=0)
>>    |------ip6_xmit
>>        |------ip6_output (dst_allfrag is ture)
>>            |------ip6_fragment
>> 
>> In ip6_fragment(), for local_df=0, drops the the packet
>> and returns EMSGSIZE.
>> 
>> The patch fixes it with adding check length of skb->len.
>> In this case, Ipv6 not to fragment upper protocol data,
>> just only add a fragment header before it. 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> The patch looks good to me.
> 
> If we wanted to optimise the allfrags case it may be better
> to reserve the space beforehand and generate the fragment header
> at the same time as we're doing the IPv6 header.
> 
> But it can't be all that important as it's been broken for so
> many years.

Right, I've applied Shan's patch, thanks.