From: Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@maine.edu>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS and /dev/mdXpY
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:08:55 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100421230855.b6bb46cc.stealth@sourcemage.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100421222612.7aa4f21a.stealth@sourcemage.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5503 bytes --]
Another interesting facts:
According to exports(5) small integers or UUIDs must be used for "fsid=" option.
If I set "fsid=__UUID__" in /etc/exports (where __UUID__ is UUID of partition returned by blkid command), then I got _exactly_ the same error as the first time: impossible to mount nfs partition from Linux client box, and "Stale NFS file handle" while trying to cd into mounted dir on OpenBSD box.
If I set "fsid=1" in /etc/exports, then from Linux client box I can write files without any performance issues, and from OpenBSD client box I get this: I copy a file (size's around 50-60 mibs) after visible full existance on the other side, it freezes and I see nfsrcvl call in top; few mins later I notice nfs_fsy call in top; a few mins later cp returns 0, and file is copied successfully.
I checked sha1sum hashes on both sides, they're equal.
On the server with tcpdump (while writing file from OpenBSD box) it's visible:
22:49:17.002445 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 164)
172.17.2.2.2049 > 81.200.8.213.1393674899: reply ok 136 write POST: REG 100644 ids 8000/10 sz 27583794 8192 bytes
22:49:17.003105 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 0, flags [+], proto UDP (17), length 1500)
81.200.8.213.1015648788 > 172.17.2.2.2049: 1472 write fh Unknown/01000101010000001D080000000000000000000000A4C0000000200000000002 8192 (8192) bytes @ 10797056 <filesync>
22:49:17.003131 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 1480, flags [+], proto UDP (17), length 1500)
81.200.8.213 > 172.17.2.2: udp
22:49:17.003345 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 2960, flags [+], proto UDP (17), length 1500)
81.200.8.213 > 172.17.2.2: udp
22:49:17.003468 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 4440, flags [+], proto UDP (17), length 1500)
81.200.8.213 > 172.17.2.2: udp
22:49:17.003590 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 5920, flags [+], proto UDP (17), length 1500)
81.200.8.213 > 172.17.2.2: udp
22:49:17.003598 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 64645, offset 7400, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 940)
81.200.8.213 > 172.17.2.2: udp
No errors, like in the first log. But something's definetely incorrect here.
Also tried mounting the partition with "-T" (tcp) flag on the client side -- no luck.
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:26:12 +0400
Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org> wrote:
> Hmm, more testing.. It works only with tiny files flawlessly on OpenBSD (client).
>
> If a filesize is around 50 mibs, then it just freezes and eats cpu with nfsrcvl call.
>
> On Linux I don't see such problem. Even big files are transfered with good enough speed.
>
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:32:01 +0400
> Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:09:20 -0500
> > Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org> wrote:
> > > > Thanks for reply, Steve!
> > > >
> > > > parameters are pretty trivial, (rw,insecure) for exports, and defaults while mounting via ``mount host:/path /path'' command.
> > > >
> > > > Yes. That sounds interesting, since XFS works fine with there partitions.
> > > > Also, I must say it's WD20EARS drives (with 4kb sector size, though parted says it's 512b).
> > > >
> > > > I also tried another NFS daemon implementation (cvs version, not .22) -- unfsd (unfs3).
> > > > It mounts ok, but when I try to write any file to the server -- I get the same error (Stale NFS file handle).
> > > >
> > > > And on the server side in dmesg I see this:
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xb6d1e05fa150ce09
> > > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x26550b0132c0b1
> > > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x8202a60053000020
> > > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xe542f93ebc8fe157
> > > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xc00cd74ea904301
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > looks like NFS protocol doesn't like something in partitioned software RAID.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Try manually setting the fsid=something in the exports file and
> > > reexport and remount on the target system, if there was a fsid
> > > collision of some sort then nfs would be hitting the wrong fs...
> > >
> > > NFS generates the fsid automatically based on the devices major minor,
> > > and it is possible there is something odd about the major minor
> > > numbers that make them not unique...and collide with someone else
> > > major minor.
> >
> > BAH! How simple!
> >
> > Thank you very much, Roger!
> >
> > I've just added fsid=1 (yes, only these few chars) to exports, and it worked! Unbelievable, really :)
> > Of course I've checked it on OpenBSD and Linux under both nfsd and unfsd. Works flawlessly.
> >
> > Thanks a lot again.
> >
> > But it seems to be a bug, right? If so, patches welcome.. I'll test it with great pleasure.
> >
> > --
> > Dont wait to die to find paradise...
> > --
> > Cheerz,
> > Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev
>
>
> --
> Dont wait to die to find paradise...
> --
> Cheerz,
> Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev
--
Dont wait to die to find paradise...
--
Cheerz,
Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-21 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-17 15:57 NFS and /dev/mdXpY Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-17 15:57 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 16:39 ` Steve Cousins
2010-04-21 16:39 ` Steve Cousins
2010-04-21 16:48 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 17:09 ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-21 17:09 ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-21 17:32 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 17:32 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 18:26 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 18:26 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 19:08 ` Vlad Glagolev [this message]
2010-04-22 1:20 ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-22 1:20 ` Roger Heflin
[not found] ` <20100417195747.5fae8834.stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-22 18:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 18:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 18:53 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 18:53 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 19:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 19:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 19:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 19:51 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 19:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 20:07 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 20:07 ` Vlad Glagolev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-17 13:41 Vlad Glagolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100421230855.b6bb46cc.stealth@sourcemage.org \
--to=stealth@sourcemage.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
--cc=steve.cousins@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.