All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Cousins <steve.cousins@maine.edu>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS and /dev/mdXpY
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:26:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100421222612.7aa4f21a.stealth@sourcemage.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100421213201.67a4a7a2.stealth@sourcemage.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2891 bytes --]

Hmm, more testing.. It works only with tiny files flawlessly on OpenBSD (client).

If a filesize is around 50 mibs, then it just freezes and eats cpu with nfsrcvl call.

On Linux I don't see such problem. Even big files are transfered with good enough speed.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:32:01 +0400
Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:09:20 -0500
> Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Vlad Glagolev <stealth@sourcemage.org> wrote:
> > > Thanks for reply, Steve!
> > >
> > > parameters are pretty trivial, (rw,insecure) for exports, and defaults while mounting via ``mount host:/path /path'' command.
> > >
> > > Yes. That sounds interesting, since XFS works fine with there partitions.
> > > Also, I must say it's WD20EARS drives (with 4kb sector size, though parted says it's 512b).
> > >
> > > I also tried another NFS daemon implementation (cvs version, not .22) -- unfsd (unfs3).
> > > It mounts ok, but when I try to write any file to the server -- I get the same error (Stale NFS file handle).
> > >
> > > And on the server side in dmesg I see this:
> > >
> > > --
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xb6d1e05fa150ce09
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x26550b0132c0b1
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x8202a60053000020
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xe542f93ebc8fe157
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xc00cd74ea904301
> > > --
> > >
> > > looks like NFS protocol doesn't like something in partitioned software RAID.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Try manually setting the fsid=something in the exports file and
> > reexport and remount on the target system, if there was a fsid
> > collision of some sort then nfs would be hitting the wrong fs...
> > 
> > NFS generates the fsid automatically based on the devices major minor,
> > and it is possible there is something odd about the major minor
> > numbers that make them not unique...and collide with someone else
> > major minor.
> 
> BAH! How simple!
> 
> Thank you very much, Roger!
> 
> I've just added fsid=1 (yes, only these few chars) to exports, and it worked! Unbelievable, really :)
> Of course I've checked it on OpenBSD and Linux under both nfsd and unfsd. Works flawlessly.
> 
> Thanks a lot again.
> 
> But it seems to be a bug, right? If so, patches welcome.. I'll test it with great pleasure.
> 
> -- 
> Dont wait to die to find paradise...
> --
> Cheerz,
> Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev


-- 
Dont wait to die to find paradise...
--
Cheerz,
Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Glagolev <stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Steve Cousins
	<steve.cousins-e7X0jjDqjFGHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-raid-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: NFS and /dev/mdXpY
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:26:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100421222612.7aa4f21a.stealth@sourcemage.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100421213201.67a4a7a2.stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2971 bytes --]

Hmm, more testing.. It works only with tiny files flawlessly on OpenBSD (client).

If a filesize is around 50 mibs, then it just freezes and eats cpu with nfsrcvl call.

On Linux I don't see such problem. Even big files are transfered with good enough speed.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:32:01 +0400
Vlad Glagolev <stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:09:20 -0500
> Roger Heflin <rogerheflin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Vlad Glagolev <stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Thanks for reply, Steve!
> > >
> > > parameters are pretty trivial, (rw,insecure) for exports, and defaults while mounting via ``mount host:/path /path'' command.
> > >
> > > Yes. That sounds interesting, since XFS works fine with there partitions.
> > > Also, I must say it's WD20EARS drives (with 4kb sector size, though parted says it's 512b).
> > >
> > > I also tried another NFS daemon implementation (cvs version, not .22) -- unfsd (unfs3).
> > > It mounts ok, but when I try to write any file to the server -- I get the same error (Stale NFS file handle).
> > >
> > > And on the server side in dmesg I see this:
> > >
> > > --
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xb6d1e05fa150ce09
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x26550b0132c0b1
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0x8202a60053000020
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xe542f93ebc8fe157
> > > NFS: server 172.17.2.2 error: fileid changed
> > > fsid 0:f: expected fileid 0x2033, got 0xc00cd74ea904301
> > > --
> > >
> > > looks like NFS protocol doesn't like something in partitioned software RAID.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > Try manually setting the fsid=something in the exports file and
> > reexport and remount on the target system, if there was a fsid
> > collision of some sort then nfs would be hitting the wrong fs...
> > 
> > NFS generates the fsid automatically based on the devices major minor,
> > and it is possible there is something odd about the major minor
> > numbers that make them not unique...and collide with someone else
> > major minor.
> 
> BAH! How simple!
> 
> Thank you very much, Roger!
> 
> I've just added fsid=1 (yes, only these few chars) to exports, and it worked! Unbelievable, really :)
> Of course I've checked it on OpenBSD and Linux under both nfsd and unfsd. Works flawlessly.
> 
> Thanks a lot again.
> 
> But it seems to be a bug, right? If so, patches welcome.. I'll test it with great pleasure.
> 
> -- 
> Dont wait to die to find paradise...
> --
> Cheerz,
> Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev


-- 
Dont wait to die to find paradise...
--
Cheerz,
Vlad "Stealth" Glagolev

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-17 15:57 NFS and /dev/mdXpY Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-17 15:57 ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 16:39 ` Steve Cousins
2010-04-21 16:39   ` Steve Cousins
2010-04-21 16:48   ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 17:09     ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-21 17:09       ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-21 17:32       ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 17:32         ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 18:26         ` Vlad Glagolev [this message]
2010-04-21 18:26           ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-21 19:08           ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22  1:20           ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-22  1:20             ` Roger Heflin
     [not found] ` <20100417195747.5fae8834.stealth-L+UJwxqiw56VyaH7bEyXVA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-22 18:25   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 18:25     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 18:53     ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 18:53       ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 19:32       ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-22 19:47         ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 19:47           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 19:51           ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 19:56             ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-22 20:07               ` Vlad Glagolev
2010-04-22 20:07                 ` Vlad Glagolev
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-17 13:41 Vlad Glagolev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100421222612.7aa4f21a.stealth@sourcemage.org \
    --to=stealth@sourcemage.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
    --cc=steve.cousins@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.