From: Ted Baker <baker@cs.fsu.edu>
To: raj@ece.cmu.edu, jayhawk@soe.ucsc.edu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
raistlin@linux.it, niehaus@ittc.ku.edu, henrik@austad.us,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, billh@gnuppy.monk
Cc: baker.tlh@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: RFC for a new Scheduling policy/class in the Linux-kernel]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:56:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426115658.GA21346@cs.fsu.edu> (raw)
I have not seen any more e-mail on this. How is it going? Is there any
chance of rolling in some corrections for the SCHED_SPORADIC treatment? In
particular, could we have a DO_NOT_RUN priority, that is guaranteed to
prevent a task from running at all?
For more detail, see http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~stanovic/papers/rtas10.pdf .
Ted
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ted Baker <baker@cs.fsu.edu>
To: raj@ece.cmu.edu, jayhawk@soe.ucsc.edu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
raistlin@linux.it, niehaus@ittc.ku.edu, henrik@austad.us,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
billh@gnuppy.monkey.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
fabio@gandalf.sssup.it, anderson@cs.unc.edu, tglx@linutronix.de,
dhaval.giani@gmail.com, cucinotta@sssup.it,
lipari@retis.sssup.it
Cc: baker.tlh@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: RFC for a new Scheduling policy/class in the Linux-kernel]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:56:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100426115658.GA21346@cs.fsu.edu> (raw)
I have not seen any more e-mail on this. How is it going? Is there any
chance of rolling in some corrections for the SCHED_SPORADIC treatment? In
particular, could we have a DO_NOT_RUN priority, that is guaranteed to
prevent a task from running at all?
For more detail, see http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~stanovic/papers/rtas10.pdf .
Ted
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-26 11:56 Ted Baker [this message]
2010-04-26 11:56 ` [Fwd: Re: RFC for a new Scheduling policy/class in the Linux-kernel] Ted Baker
2010-04-26 18:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-26 18:37 ` Doug Niehaus
2010-05-03 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-03 15:54 ` Ted Baker
2010-05-03 16:13 ` Ted Baker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-16 19:41 Raj Rajkumar
[not found] <4A5F7254.3020809@ece.cmu.edu>
2009-07-16 19:18 ` James H. Anderson
[not found] ` <4A5F806D.6040701@ece.cmu.edu>
2009-07-16 19:46 ` James H. Anderson
2009-07-16 20:47 ` Raj Rajkumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100426115658.GA21346@cs.fsu.edu \
--to=baker@cs.fsu.edu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=baker.tlh@comcast.net \
--cc=billh@gnuppy.monk \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=jayhawk@soe.ucsc.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niehaus@ittc.ku.edu \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=raj@ece.cmu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.