All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:15:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428081545.GA19027@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2j412e6f7f1004280052ice434710ra17a4516236bd3f3@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:52:01PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue
> >>
> >> If the exclusive wait queue is also a LIFO queue as the normal wait queue, the
> >> process who goes to sleep recently, will be woke up first. As its memory is
> >> more likely in cache, we will get better performance. And when there are many
> >> processes waiting on a exclusive wait queue, some of them may not be woke up,
> >> if the others can handle the workload, and it will reduce the load of
> >> the scheduler.
> >>
> >
> > Starve some processes for performance?
> >
> 
> Starve? Oh, No. If we don't need these processes, and we can do better

What do you mean "we don't need these processes"?

> without them, why we wake them up?

So some processs(at the tail of exclusive list)will be treated abnormally
and it will sleep for a long time, is this reasonable?

> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:15:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428081545.GA19027@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2j412e6f7f1004280052ice434710ra17a4516236bd3f3@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:52:01PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue
> >>
> >> If the exclusive wait queue is also a LIFO queue as the normal wait queue, the
> >> process who goes to sleep recently, will be woke up first. As its memory is
> >> more likely in cache, we will get better performance. And when there are many
> >> processes waiting on a exclusive wait queue, some of them may not be woke up,
> >> if the others can handle the workload, and it will reduce the load of
> >> the scheduler.
> >>
> >
> > Starve some processes for performance?
> >
> 
> Starve? Oh, No. If we don't need these processes, and we can do better

What do you mean "we don't need these processes"?

> without them, why we wake them up?

So some processs(at the tail of exclusive list)will be treated abnormally
and it will sleep for a long time, is this reasonable?

> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Changli Gao(xiaosuo@gmail.com)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-28  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-28  5:03 [RFC] sched: implement the exclusive wait queue as a LIFO queue Changli Gao
2010-04-28  6:22 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  8:05   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  7:47 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-04-28  7:47   ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-04-28  7:52   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  7:52     ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  8:15     ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2010-04-28  8:15       ` Yong Zhang
2010-04-28  8:23       ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  9:25         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-28  9:29         ` David Howells
2010-04-28 11:17           ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 11:17             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 13:21             ` David Howells
2010-04-28 13:21             ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-28 13:21               ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-28 13:42               ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 15:25                 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-28 15:49                   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 18:57             ` Davide Libenzi
2010-04-28  9:32 ` David Howells
2010-04-28 13:56   ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 13:56     ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 14:06     ` David Howells
2010-04-28 14:53       ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 14:53         ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 15:00         ` David Howells
2010-04-28 15:33           ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28 15:33             ` Changli Gao
2010-04-28  9:34 ` David Howells
2010-04-28 13:47   ` Changli Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100428081545.GA19027@windriver.com \
    --to=yong.zhang@windriver.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=xtfeng@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.