All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 10:19:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100501091943.GA12172@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EAF47CD23C76F840A9E7FCE10091EFAB02C5217DFF@dbde02.ent.ti.com>

On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:54:55AM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> This seems to be good solution if it's doable. Reserving memory in the boot
> is not so flexible and might end up in waste of memory.

However, allocating large pages (larger than 4K) is unreliable due to
fragmentation.  There's two factors here - the larger the allocation,
and the longer the system has been running, the more likely such an
allocation is to fail.

Since we'd need to enforce a minimum allocation size of 1MB in order to
unmap the direct mapping, we're asking for an order-8 page - and I think
you'll find that'll be fairly unreliable if you want to keep allocating
and freeing it.

The DMA allocators can handle anything up to MAX_ORDER-order allocations
provided it has enough virtual memory space available to it - so if you
want to go down this route, you might as well switch to using that.
(However, eventually the DMA allocator also needs fixing to avoid the
dual-mappings that it creates.)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-01  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-23 14:40 [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM Russell King
2010-04-30 16:33 ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 16:38   ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-01  6:24     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-01  9:19       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-05-03 15:59     ` George G. Davis
2010-05-04 15:29       ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-05 16:23         ` George G. Davis
2010-05-05 16:30           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-05 16:33             ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 18:19   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-30 22:30     ` George G. Davis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-08  9:48 Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-23 14:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-04-23 14:27   ` Shilimkar, Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100501091943.GA12172@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.