From: gdavis@mvista.com (George G. Davis)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:59:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503155900.GA26552@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272645511.22683.1.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:38:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 17:33 +0100, George G. Davis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:40:58PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > > Above change is necessary but what an alternative approach is for this.
> > > > There are many use case where ioremap* is needed.
> > >
> > > This is a very difficult issue to answer; the only way we can safely
> > > remap RAM with different attributes is if we disable the existing
> > > mappings - but since we create those with 1MB sections, that's far
> > > from easy to achieve.
> > >
> > > I think a viable safe solution is to set aside some RAM at boot (which
> > > the kernel doesn't manage at all) and then use ioremap on that; that
> > > approach will still work with this patch in place.
> >
> > So cases such as the omapfb driver which use reserve_bootmem() (in
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c) and then later use ioremap_wc() to remap
> > reserved memory (in drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c)
> > will no longer work with this change.
>
> Another solution would be to allow the unmapping of sections from the
> kernel linear mapping. I think x86 does this already for the AGP
> aperture.
I've yet to grok that code but have been curious about how this is done
for x86 graphics. : )
--
Regards,
George
>
> --
> Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 14:40 [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM Russell King
2010-04-30 16:33 ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 16:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-01 6:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-01 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-03 15:59 ` George G. Davis [this message]
2010-05-04 15:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-05 16:23 ` George G. Davis
2010-05-05 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-05 16:33 ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 18:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-30 22:30 ` George G. Davis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-08 9:48 Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-23 14:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-04-23 14:27 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503155900.GA26552@mvista.com \
--to=gdavis@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.