From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 15906] serious performance regression in "umount" on ext4 over LVM
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 21:48:29 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005042148.o44LmTv0026158@demeter.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-15906-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15906
--- Comment #8 from Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> 2010-05-04 21:48:27 ---
Kees, no, 68db1961bbf4e16c220ccec4a780e966bc1fece3 made the test on loopback
slower, because now a barrier from a filesystem on a loopback device issues an
fsync on the underlying filesystem which issues a cache flush on the underlying
block device .... you get the picture.
Unless we really have gratuitous barrier issues here, there's probably not a
whole lot to be done, though maybe some batching is possible.
As for the business about ext3, there is nothing mysterious or odd there
either, ext3 mounts with barriers off by default, despite my best efforts, and
mounting it with the ext4 driver does turn them on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 20:36 [Bug 15906] New: serious performance regression in "umount" on ext4 over LVM bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 20:37 ` [Bug 15906] " bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 20:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 21:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 21:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 21:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 21:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-04 21:48 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2010-05-05 0:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 3:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 4:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 4:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 7:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 8:27 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-05-05 8:40 ` Jens Axboe
2010-05-05 9:06 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-05-05 7:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 19:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 20:34 ` [Bug 15906] performance regression in "umount" of filesystems using barriers bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 21:36 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-05-05 20:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 21:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-05 21:55 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-05-06 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-06 7:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-06 7:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-07 9:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-08 14:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-17 3:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-17 3:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-17 10:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-19 18:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-19 19:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-21 1:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-21 2:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-21 6:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-22 4:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-26 16:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005042148.o44LmTv0026158@demeter.kernel.org \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.