From: Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Test Project <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Sharyathi Nagesh <sharyath@in.ibm.com>,
Sachin P Sant <ssant@in.ibm.com>,
"SUZUKI K. POULOSE" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
B N Poornima <bnpoorni@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [LTP] [06/12 FAILURE] Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 12:27:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100506065729.23879.9995.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100506065548.23879.63131.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
Subject:Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail
I know Serge and Dan is already working on it.
Issues Description Below:
====================================================
# ./runltp -f containers
<<<test_start>>>
tag=Containers stime=1271856718
cmdline="container_test.sh"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
Running utsns tests.
unshare tests
test 1 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 1 (unshare): success
test 2 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 2 (unshare): success
test 3 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 3 (unshare): success
test 4 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 4 (unshare): successful
test 5 (unshare)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : P2: P1 claims error
clone tests
test 1 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 1 (clone): success
test 2 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 2 (clone): success
test 3 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 3 (clone): success
test 4 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : test 4 (clone): successful
test 5 (clone)
uts_namespace 1 TPASS : P2: P1 claims error
Running ipcns tests.
****************** sysvipc tests ******************
sysvipc: SharedMemory none
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : none
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : plain cloned process found shmid
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : none
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : none
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : none
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : none
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process able to access shmem segment
created
sysvipc: SharedMemory clone
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : clone
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : clone
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : clone: child process didn't find shmid
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : clone
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : clone
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to allocate shmem seg with the same
key
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : clone
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : clone : In namespace2 unable to access the shmem
seg created in Namespace1
sysvipc: SharedMemory unshare
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : unshare
sysvipc_namespace 0 TINFO : shmid namespaces test : unshare
sysvipc_namespace 1 TPASS : unshare: child process didn't find shmid
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : unshare
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create shared mem segment
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : unshare
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to allocate shmem seg with the same
key
shmem_2nstest 0 TINFO : Shared Memory namespace test : unshare
shmem_2nstest 1 TPASS : unshare : In namespace2 unable to access the
shmem seg created in Namespace1
sysvipc: MesgQ none
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : none
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process found mesgq inside container
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : none
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : Mesg read of 18 bytes; Type 5: Msg: Message of
type 5!
sysvipc: MesgQ clone
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : clone
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : clone
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : clone: Container didn't find mesgq
sysvipc: MesgQ unshare
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : unshare
mesgq_nstest 0 TINFO : mesgq namespaces test : unshare
mesgq_nstest 1 TPASS : unshare: Container didn't find mesgq
sysvipc: Semaphore none
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : none
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process found semaphore inside
container
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : none
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : PID 4362: Fetched existing semaphore..id = 10158080
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : none
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : none
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Sem1: File locked, Critical section is updated...
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : none
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : Plain cloned process able to access the semaphore
created
sysvipc: Semaphore clone
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : clone
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : clone
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : clone: Container didn't find semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : clone
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : clone
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to create semaphore with sameKey
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : clone
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : clone : In namespace2 unable to access the
semaphore created in Namespace1
sysvipc: Semaphore unshare
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : unshare
sem_nstest 0 TINFO : Semaphore namespaces Isolation test : unshare
sem_nstest 1 TPASS : unshare: Container didn't find semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : unshare
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont1: Able to create semaphore
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : unshare
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Cont2: Able to create semaphore with sameKey
semtest_2ns 0 TINFO : Semaphore Namespaces Test : unshare
semtest_2ns 1 TPASS : unshare : In namespace2 unable to access the
semaphore created in Namespace1
Running pidns tests.
pid_namespace1 0 TINFO : PIDNS test is running inside container
pid_namespace1 1 TPASS : Success:
pid_namespace3 0 TINFO : Checking pid for parent ns and container-init
Parent namespace pid = 4383,container parent
pid = 0,and container pid = 1
pid_namespace3 1 TFAIL : Failed to open /proc directory
pid_namespace4 0 TINFO : PIDNS test is running inside container
pid_namespace4 1 TPASS : Container init : I was not killed !
pidns05 0 TINFO : 5 Nested Containers are created
pidns05 1 TPASS : The number of containers killed are 2
pidns06 0 TINFO : Parent: Passing the pid of the process 4394
pidns06 1 TPASS : Container: tried kill() on the parent pid 4394: errno
set to 3 (No such process), as expected
pidns06 2 TPASS : Container: While killing non existent pid errno set to
3 : No such process, as expected
pidns06 0 TINFO : Parent: Passing the pid of the process 4394
pidns30 1 TBROK : parent: mq_open() failed (Permission denied)
pidns31 1 TBROK : parent: mq_open() failed (Permission denied)
pidns10 1 TPASS : cinit: expected kill(-1, sig) failure.
pidns12 0 TINFO : parent: PID is 4400
pidns12 1 TPASS : cinit: signalling PID (from other namespace) is 0 as
expected
pidns12 0 TINFO : parent: PID is 4400
pidns13 0 TINFO : cinit2: writing some data in pipe
pidns13 0 TINFO : cinit1: setup handler for async I/O on pipe
pidns13 1 TPASS : cinit1: si_fd is 5, si_code is 1
pidns16 1 TPASS : container init continued successfuly, after handling
signal -USR1
pidns17 1 TPASS : cinit: all children are terminated.
pidns20 0 TINFO : cinit: blocked SIGUSR1
pidns20 0 TINFO : cinit: unblocking SIGUSR1
pidns20 1 TPASS : cinit: user function is called as expected
pidns20 0 TINFO : parent: signalled SIGUSR1 to container
Running POSIX message queue tests.
mq_open: Permission denied
posixmq_namespace_01 0 TINFO : Testing posix mq namespaces through
unshare(2).
posixmq_namespace_01 1 TFAIL : mq_open failed
Running netns tests.
parentns.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: Pinging ChildNS from ParentNS
sshd re-exec requires execution with an absolute path^M
childns.sh 0 TINFO : PASS: Pinging ParentNS from ChildNS
crtchild: PASS
netns_2children 1 TFAIL : Error while running the scripts
two_children_ns: return code is 1 ;
sshd re-exec requires execution with an absolute path^M
childns.sh 0 TINFO : Successfully Renamed device to veth1
Files /tmp/sys_b4_child_killed and /tmp/sys_aftr_child_killed differ
Cannot find device "veth1"
crtchild_delchild: PASS
paripv6.sh 0 TINFO : IPv6: Pinging child from parent: PASS
childipv6.sh 0 TINFO : IPv6: Pinging Parent from Child: PASS
par_chld_ipv6: PASS
parentns.sh 0 TINFO : Pinging ChildNS from ParentNS
sshd re-exec requires execution with an absolute path^M
Error: Can't ftp to 192.168.0.181: Connection refused
childns.sh 1 TFAIL : ftp failed
Error while running the script
two_children_ns: return code is 1 ; par_chld_ftp: FAIL 1 ;
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=41 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=14 cstime=98
<<<test_end>>>
Regards--
Subrata
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 6:55 [LTP] [00/12 FAILURE] Reporting LTP run issues on Fedora 13 ppc6 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [01/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory CGROUP test creates Call Trace and Badness at mm/oom_kill.c:393 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [02/12 FAILURE] LTPX File Capabilities tests becomes defunct and does not complete beyond 12 hours Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [03/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory Conroller test fails and hangs system for more than " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [04/12 FAILURE] LTPX sysctl03 test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:05 ` [LTP] [04/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 13:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:38 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 18:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-07 9:05 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 9:22 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [05/12 FAILURE] LTPX proc01 " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:04 ` [LTP] [05/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-07-27 17:37 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 17:38 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:57 ` Subrata Modak [this message]
2010-05-06 17:53 ` [LTP] [06/12 FAILURE] Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Dan Smith
2010-07-27 17:40 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [07/12 FAILURE] LTPX MEMORY CGROUP FUNCTION tests fails Subrata Modak
2010-07-28 17:34 ` [LTP] [07/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [08/12 FAILURE] LTPX clock gettime03 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 7:04 ` [LTP] [08/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 7:55 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 9:03 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 17:42 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-07 8:53 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-01 15:40 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-06-02 12:57 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 18:03 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [09/12 FAILURE] LTPX timer create04 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 2:12 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTP " Henry xu
2010-07-28 12:46 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [10/12 FAILURE] LTPX ar01 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [11/12 FAILURE] LTPX file test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:01 ` [LTP] [11/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:59 ` [12/12 FAILURE] LTPX cron tests fails Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100506065729.23879.9995.sendpatchset@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com \
--to=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bnpoorni@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sharyath@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ssant@in.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.