From: "Marc Deop i Argemí" <damnshock@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:47:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005061047.30128.damnshock@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273079871.19196.9.camel@segulix>
On Wednesday May 5 2010 19:17:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> > On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you
> > > use ubuntu ?
> >
> > Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S
>
> xorg-x11-drv-intel > n require kernel > n and libdrm > n .
What does that "n" mean? I don't understand that sentence.
>
> > I'm happily running Archlinux
>
> happily ?
Yeah, happily. I love this distro :D
> So maybe is yours fault , because 945GM works since early drives without
> problems.
It does work. However, not fine performancewise. And I am not the only one to
say that...
> Update only Xserver , the most probably that things stop work , after
> that you should recompile all drives (including xorg-x11-drv-intel) ,
> see if xorg-x11-drv-intel requires a new libdrm and if libdrm requires a
> new mesa etc . If so before compile Xserver , you should compile libdrm
> and after that mesa.
> So the order should be:
> 1st kernel
> 2nd libdrm
> 3 mesa.
> 4 Xserver
> 5 all drives.
I've done all that as my distro packages are not that updated yet. I even got
the source from git. The problemes were still there...
> Top-posting is to read only the top of the posting ,
I'm affraid you are mistaken. Top-posting is to write with the "replied" text
below
> If you know the
> message , is more efficient . that looking for the answers in meddle of
> the text.
I'll give you that.
However, I tend to get dozens (sometimes hundreds) of emails per day: I
usually *don't* know the message ;)
Damnshock
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-30 15:45 i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression SD
2010-04-30 18:23 ` Felix Miata
2010-04-30 18:28 ` Alan W. Irwin
2010-04-30 19:25 ` SD
2010-04-30 19:59 ` Adam Jackson
2010-04-30 20:56 ` Clemens Eisserer
2010-04-30 21:46 ` Adam Jackson
2010-05-01 12:01 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2010-05-02 19:48 ` Marc Deop i Argemí
2010-05-05 1:31 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2010-05-05 13:59 ` Marc Deop i Argemí
2010-05-05 17:17 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2010-05-06 8:47 ` Marc Deop i Argemí [this message]
2010-05-06 16:07 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2010-04-30 23:59 ` Sven Arvidsson
[not found] <262866.1172.qm@web110506.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
2010-05-05 2:06 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005061047.30128.damnshock@gmail.com \
--to=damnshock@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.