All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Avoid race between shift_arg_pages() and rmap_walk() during migration by not migrating temporary stacks
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:05:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100510190559.GD22632@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005101239400.13652@router.home>

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:41:07PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> A simple way to disallow migration of pages is to increment the refcount
> of a page.

Ok for migrate but it won't prevent to crash in split_huge_page rmap
walk, nor the PG_lock. Why for a rmap bug have a migrate specific fix?
The fix that makes execve the only special place to handle in every
rmap walk, is at least more maintainable than a fix that makes one of
the rmap walk users special and won't fix the others, as there will be
more than just 1 user that requires this. My fix didn't make execve
special and it didn't require execve knowledge into the every rmap
walk like migrate (split_huge_page etc...) but as long as the kernel
doesn't crash I'm fine ;).

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Avoid race between shift_arg_pages() and rmap_walk() during migration by not migrating temporary stacks
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 21:05:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100510190559.GD22632@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005101239400.13652@router.home>

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:41:07PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> A simple way to disallow migration of pages is to increment the refcount
> of a page.

Ok for migrate but it won't prevent to crash in split_huge_page rmap
walk, nor the PG_lock. Why for a rmap bug have a migrate specific fix?
The fix that makes execve the only special place to handle in every
rmap walk, is at least more maintainable than a fix that makes one of
the rmap walk users special and won't fix the others, as there will be
more than just 1 user that requires this. My fix didn't make execve
special and it didn't require execve knowledge into the every rmap
walk like migrate (split_huge_page etc...) but as long as the kernel
doesn't crash I'm fine ;).

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-29  8:32 [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V3 Mel Gorman
2010-04-29  8:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-29  8:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Take all anon_vma locks in anon_vma_lock Mel Gorman
2010-04-29  8:32   ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-02 17:28   ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-02 17:28     ` Minchan Kim
2010-04-29  8:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm,migration: Avoid race between shift_arg_pages() and rmap_walk() during migration by not migrating temporary stacks Mel Gorman
2010-04-29  8:32   ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-29 16:21   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-29 16:21     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-30 19:22     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-30 19:22       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-30 20:21       ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-30 20:21         ` Rik van Riel
2010-05-01  9:39       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-01  9:39         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-01 13:02         ` Rik van Riel
2010-05-01 13:02           ` Rik van Riel
2010-05-02 17:40     ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-02 17:40       ` Minchan Kim
2010-05-02 18:20       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-02 18:20         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-04 10:32     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-04 10:32       ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-04 12:56       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-04 12:56         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-04 14:33         ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-04 14:33           ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-04 14:44           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-04 14:44             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-02  1:56   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-02  1:56     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-04  9:45     ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-04  9:45       ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-10 17:41       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-10 17:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-10 17:56         ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-10 17:56           ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-11 13:59           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-11 13:59             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-11 15:11             ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-11 15:11               ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-11 15:56               ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-11 15:56                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-11 16:15                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-11 16:15                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-05-11 16:29                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-11 16:29                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-10 19:05         ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2010-05-10 19:05           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-11  0:10           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-11  0:10             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-04-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix migration races in rmap_walk() V3 Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-30 18:28   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-01 13:51   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-01 13:51     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-03 15:33     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-03 15:33       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-03 23:41       ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-03 23:41         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-05-04 17:35         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-05-04 17:35           ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100510190559.GD22632@random.random \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.