Re: Question: is 'gcc' supposed to replace the libstdc++.la installed by 'gcc-cross'?

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>]

On (17/05/10 11:12), Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:45 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: 
> > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 17-05-10 18:49, Khem Raj wrote:
> > >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I could not build a console-image as I ran out of disk space. Have you
> > >> considered removing
> > >> -g3 from default angstrom builds.
> > 
> > what is -g3 offering over -g at -O2 and how good the additional debug info is ?
> 
> -g3 offers lots of stuff, spelled out in some doc or another is macro
> expansion, for example.  I don't know if it offers enough stuff that you
> say don't need the sources themselves around still too tho.  Koen?

If -g3 is intended, some options to reduce debug info size should be
considered like
-feliminate-dwarf2-dups -femit-struct-debug-baseonly
-femit-struct-debug-reduced
etc.

-Khem