All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Reduce get_current() to the asm-generic implementation where possible
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:47:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100518194753.GA2318@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100518164537.6194.73366.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

David Howells wrote:
> Reduce get_current() to the asm-generic implementation where
> possible to remove duplicate cases.
> 
> Note that this will lose the const attribute on get_current() for ARM and
> MN10300.  This will be added back in a later patch for all architectures.
[...]
> -static inline struct task_struct *get_current(void) __attribute_const__;
> -
> -static inline struct task_struct *get_current(void)
> -{
> -	return current_thread_info()->task;
> -}


Last time I looked, GCC didn't seem to do anything useful with the
const attribute on inline functions.  I.e. no elimination of duplicate calls.

(It does eliminate them when out-of-line.)

So there is probably no point putting the const attribute back, unless
GCC has changed at this.

It might be able to eliminate some duplicates if the asm inside
current_thread_info() is consty enough, and duplicate ->task
dereferences might be eliminated by strict-aliasing in some cases.

-- Jamie

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-18 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-18 16:45 [PATCH 1/3] Reduce get_current() to the asm-generic implementation where possible David Howells
2010-05-18 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] Mark the 'current' pointer register read-only when such a thing exists David Howells
2010-05-18 21:05   ` David Miller
2010-05-18 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] Make get_current() __attribute__((const)) David Howells
2010-05-18 21:22   ` schedule() && prev/current (Was: [PATCH 3/3] Make get_current() __attribute__((const))) Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-19  6:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-19 10:27       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-19 10:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-19 12:57           ` [PATCH] schedule: simplify the reacquire_kernel_lock() logic Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-19 13:11             ` Yong Zhang
2010-06-09 10:13             ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Simplify " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-19 13:07         ` schedule() && prev/current (Was: [PATCH 3/3] Make get_current() __attribute__((const))) Yong Zhang
2010-05-18 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] Reduce get_current() to the asm-generic implementation where possible Kyle McMartin
2010-05-18 19:47 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-05-19  6:21   ` Nick Piggin
2010-05-19 11:02     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-21 10:13   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100518194753.GA2318@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.