All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for request-based device
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:45:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519144542.GD24618@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519143900.GC24618@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 19 2010 at 10:39am -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:

> > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > dm_table_setup_md_queue() may allocate memory with blocking mode.
> > > Blocking allocation inside exclusive _hash_lock can cause deadlock;
> > > e.g. when it has to wait for other dm devices to resume to free some
> > > memory.

<snip>

> We discussed this and I understand the scope of the problem now.
> 
> Just reiterating what you covered when you first pointed this issue out:
> 
> It could be that a table load gets blocked (waiting on a memory
> allocation).  The table load can take as long as it needs.  But we can't
> have it block holding the exclusive _hash_lock while blocking.  Having
> _hash_lock prevents further DM ioctls.  The table load's allocation may
> be blocking waiting for writeback to a DM device that will be resumed by
> another thread.
> 
> Thanks again for pointing this out; I'll work to arrive at an
> alternative locking scheme.  Likely introduce a lock local to the
> multiple_device (effectively the 'queue_lock' I had before).  But

s/multiple_device/mapped_device/

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-10 22:55 [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-05-10 22:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-10 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for request-based device Mike Snitzer
2010-05-10 22:55   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11  4:23   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 13:15     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-12  8:23       ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-13  3:57         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-14  8:06           ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-14 14:08             ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-17  9:27               ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-17 17:27                 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-18  8:32                   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-18 13:46                     ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-18 13:46                       ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19  5:57                       ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 12:01                         ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 12:01                           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:39                           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:45                             ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-05-20 11:21                             ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-20 17:07                               ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-21  8:32                                 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-21 13:34                                   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-24  9:58                                     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 21:51                           ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13  4:31   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13  5:02     ` [RFC PATCH 3/2] dm: bio-based device must not register elevator in sysfs Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 22:14       ` [PATCH 3/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Jens Axboe
2010-05-11 13:18   ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 13:21     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100519144542.GD24618@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.