All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/11] Fix find_unbound_irq in presence of ioapic irqs.
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:36:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527153601.GC4342@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005271505200.25605@kaball-desktop>

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:49:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > 
> > Can you provide a more detailed description of why this is needed?
> > 
> 
> We need it because we don't want to break the assumption that the first
> 16 irqs are ISA irqs, and among the other irqs we actually want to be
> sure they are available before using them.

Interesting. So with this commit: 482839e7 and bfbc226d
where we try our best to allocate IRQs for Xen starting from high and
then going down (so that when we are running in PV context with Xen PCI
passthrough we can allocate IRQs for physical devices above IRQ 16 and
not collide with Xen event channels), this would still work.

But we actually wouldn't test the availability of the first sixteen IRQ
for a long time (or never).

> 
> 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/xen/events.c |   11 ++++++++++-
> > >  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > index 8b68fc4..1356fa2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > @@ -339,9 +339,18 @@ static int find_unbound_irq(void)
> > >  	int irq;
> > >  	struct irq_desc *desc;
> > >  
> > > -	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++)
> > > +	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++) {
> > > +		desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > > +		/* only 0->15 have init'd desc; handle irq > 16 */
> > > +		if (desc == NULL)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		if (desc->chip == &no_irq_chip)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		if (desc->chip != &xen_dynamic_chip)
> > > +			continue;
> > >  		if (irq_info[irq].type == IRQT_UNBOUND)
> > >  			break;
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > >  	if (irq == nr_irqs)
> > >  		panic("No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!\n");
> > > -- 
> > > 1.5.4.3
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] Fix find_unbound_irq in presence of ioapic irqs.
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:36:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527153601.GC4342@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1005271505200.25605@kaball-desktop>

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:49:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > 
> > Can you provide a more detailed description of why this is needed?
> > 
> 
> We need it because we don't want to break the assumption that the first
> 16 irqs are ISA irqs, and among the other irqs we actually want to be
> sure they are available before using them.

Interesting. So with this commit: 482839e7 and bfbc226d
where we try our best to allocate IRQs for Xen starting from high and
then going down (so that when we are running in PV context with Xen PCI
passthrough we can allocate IRQs for physical devices above IRQ 16 and
not collide with Xen event channels), this would still work.

But we actually wouldn't test the availability of the first sixteen IRQ
for a long time (or never).

> 
> 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/xen/events.c |   11 ++++++++++-
> > >  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > index 8b68fc4..1356fa2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > > @@ -339,9 +339,18 @@ static int find_unbound_irq(void)
> > >  	int irq;
> > >  	struct irq_desc *desc;
> > >  
> > > -	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++)
> > > +	for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++) {
> > > +		desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > > +		/* only 0->15 have init'd desc; handle irq > 16 */
> > > +		if (desc == NULL)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		if (desc->chip == &no_irq_chip)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		if (desc->chip != &xen_dynamic_chip)
> > > +			continue;
> > >  		if (irq_info[irq].type == IRQT_UNBOUND)
> > >  			break;
> > > +	}
> > >  
> > >  	if (irq == nr_irqs)
> > >  		panic("No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!\n");
> > > -- 
> > > 1.5.4.3
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-24 18:25 [PATCH 0 of 12] PV on HVM Xen Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] Add support for hvm_op Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] early PV on HVM Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] evtchn delivery " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] Fix find_unbound_irq in presence of ioapic irqs Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-26 18:26   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-05-27 14:49     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 15:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2010-05-27 15:36         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] Xen PCI platform device driver Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-28  8:55   ` [Xen-devel] " Zhigang Wang
2010-05-28 14:18     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-28 14:18       ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] Add suspend\resume support for PV on HVM guests Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:20   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-25 20:20     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] Allow xen platform pci device to be compiled as a module Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] Fix possible NULL pointer dereference in print_IO_APIC Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] __setup_vector_irq: handle NULL chip_data Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] Support VIRQ_TIMER and pvclock on HVM Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:24   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-25 20:24     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-26 13:08     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] Unplug emulated disks and nics Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 20:31   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-26 12:27     ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-26 20:59       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-27 12:29         ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 12:29           ` Stefano Stabellini
     [not found]         ` <m2n.s.1OHcBK-0018DA@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
2010-05-27 14:49           ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Jackson
2010-05-27 14:49             ` Ian Jackson
2010-05-27 17:25             ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 17:51             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-27 17:51               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-05-27 18:10               ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-27 18:10                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 0 of 12] PV on HVM Xen Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-24 18:30 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-24 19:06   ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25  6:14     ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-25  9:55       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2010-05-25 11:15         ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-24 18:36 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-28 10:25 ` Boris Derzhavets
2010-05-28 10:45   ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-05-28 11:06   ` Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100527153601.GC4342@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.