From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Ryan Mallon <ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Robert Emanuele <rob-3bOSxtzXIkJzbRFIqnYvSA@public.gmane.org>,
Linus Walleij
<linus.ml.walleij-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Controlling Driver Load Order
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:09:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527220951.GD5636@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFEEA08.70401-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]
> > Always ask which kernel is used, sigh...
>
> Sorry? I didn't see a kernel version mentioned. I went looking because I
> had though that i2c-gpio was already subsys_initcall.
Sorry, I missed emphasizing that my comment was meant as a "note-to-myself".
You were perfectly right, of course, I should have done the same.
> >> There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c
> >> busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded
> >
> > Oh, where was that? Can't recall (but couldn't recall that I acked the i2c-gpio
> > patch above as well ;))
> >
>
> Moving the embedded i2c busses to subsys_initcall was discussed here:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-June/004142.html. The
> i2c_gpio bus got mentioned, which is why I thought it had already been
> changed.
Thanks for the pointer!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Controlling Driver Load Order
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:09:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527220951.GD5636@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFEEA08.70401@bluewatersys.com>
> > Always ask which kernel is used, sigh...
>
> Sorry? I didn't see a kernel version mentioned. I went looking because I
> had though that i2c-gpio was already subsys_initcall.
Sorry, I missed emphasizing that my comment was meant as a "note-to-myself".
You were perfectly right, of course, I should have done the same.
> >> There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c
> >> busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded
> >
> > Oh, where was that? Can't recall (but couldn't recall that I acked the i2c-gpio
> > patch above as well ;))
> >
>
> Moving the embedded i2c busses to subsys_initcall was discussed here:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-June/004142.html. The
> i2c_gpio bus got mentioned, which is why I thought it had already been
> changed.
Thanks for the pointer!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100528/5f9d5fe7/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Ryan Mallon <ryan@bluewatersys.com>
Cc: Robert Emanuele <rob@emanuele.us>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Controlling Driver Load Order
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:09:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527220951.GD5636@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BFEEA08.70401@bluewatersys.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]
> > Always ask which kernel is used, sigh...
>
> Sorry? I didn't see a kernel version mentioned. I went looking because I
> had though that i2c-gpio was already subsys_initcall.
Sorry, I missed emphasizing that my comment was meant as a "note-to-myself".
You were perfectly right, of course, I should have done the same.
> >> There was a discussion a while back to make all of the embedded i2c
> >> busses be subsys_initcall since i2c is often a system bus on embedded
> >
> > Oh, where was that? Can't recall (but couldn't recall that I acked the i2c-gpio
> > patch above as well ;))
> >
>
> Moving the embedded i2c busses to subsys_initcall was discussed here:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-June/004142.html. The
> i2c_gpio bus got mentioned, which is why I thought it had already been
> changed.
Thanks for the pointer!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 19:08 Controlling Driver Load Order Robert Emanuele
2010-05-26 19:08 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-26 21:04 ` Linus Walleij
2010-05-26 21:04 ` Linus Walleij
2010-05-26 21:04 ` Linus Walleij
2010-05-26 21:04 ` Linus Walleij
2010-05-26 23:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-26 23:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 1:33 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 1:33 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 1:39 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 1:39 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 4:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 4:13 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100527041358.GA14070-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-27 17:07 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 17:07 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 17:07 ` Robert Emanuele
2010-05-27 21:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 21:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 21:09 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-05-27 21:09 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-05-27 21:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 21:42 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100527214209.GC5636-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-27 21:54 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-05-27 21:54 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-05-27 21:54 ` Ryan Mallon
[not found] ` <4BFEEA08.70401-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-27 22:09 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-05-27 22:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-05-27 22:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100527220951.GD5636@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.ml.walleij-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob-3bOSxtzXIkJzbRFIqnYvSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ryan-7Wk5F4Od5/oYd5yxfr4S2w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.